Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5792 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.494 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR B.N.
S/O NAGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
R/AT No.1300, 1ST FLOOR
21ST B MAIN, HSR LAYOUT
SECTOR 1
BENGALURU-560 102
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. VINOD PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. RANJITHA L.
W/O KARTHIK
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
CEO/SECRETARY
KARNATAKA STATE COLLEGE LECTURERS
AND SCHOOL TEACHERS HOUSE BUILDING
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
No.55/1, 3RD CROSS
GURUKULA LAYOUT
J.P. NAGAR, KUPPULRU
MYSURU-570 031
2. SRI. MAHADEVA SWAMY M.S.
S/O SHIVAPPA M.
PRESIDENT
KARNATAKA STATE COLLEGE LECTURERS
-
2
AND SCHOOL TEACHERS HOUSE BUILDING
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
No.22, 2ND CROSS
BASAWESHWARA MARGA
(IN-FRONT OF THE PARK)
GURUKULA LAYOUT
J.P. NAGAR, KUPPULRU
MYSURU-570 031
...ACCUSED
(BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE ACTION FOR
THE WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT
DATED 05.12.2023 PASSED IN W.P.No.19832/2022, WHEREBY
THE POSITIVE ORDER OF ADDL. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES DATED 12.04.2022, TO ALLOT THE SITE IS
CONFIRMED.
THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
JUDGMENT ON 06.08.2025 AND COMING ON FOR
PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT THIS DAY, ANU SIVARAMAN
J., PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
This Contempt of Court case is filed alleging non-
compliance of the order dated 05.12.2023 in
W.P.No.19832/2022. The writ petition was filed challenging
the communication dated 12.04.2022 in No.HSG-
1/61/HHS/2021-22 issued by respondent No.2. The writ
-
petition was dismissed holding that the petitioner's conduct
disentitled him to relief, whereby upholding the Registrar of
Co-operative Societies order dated 12.04.2022 for allotment
of Site No.219 in the name of Shri. Praveen Kumar B.N, the
complainant.
2. We have heard Shri. Vinod Prasad, learned
counsel for the complainant and Shri. Devi Prasad Shetty,
learned counsel for accused No. 1 and 2.
3. The complainant submits that though the writ
petition filed against the order of the Registrar of Co-
operative Societies was dismissed by this Court, the
allotment in favour of the complainant has still not been
effected.
4. Having considered the contentions advanced, we
are of the opinion that since the writ petition filed by the
Society stands dismissed, it is for the complainant to work
out his remedies for allotment of the Site if the same has
not been done in compliance with the order passed by the
competent officer under the Co-operative Societies Act.
-
Since the writ petition stands dismissed there is no question
of non-compliance with the directions of this Court and a
complaint alleging Contempt of Court would not be
maintainable in the facts and circumstances of the case.
5. The Contempt of Court Case is closed without
prejudice to the right of the complainant to avail the
appropriate remedies as available to him under law and to
seek allotment in terms of applicable orders.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/-
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
cp*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!