Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5784 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:4747
RSA No. 200088 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 200088 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. ARUNA
W/O LATE RAMU RATHOD,
AGE: 51 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: PANEGAON,
TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI.
2. AMITA
W/O RAHUL,
AGE: 25 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: WARNIHALOKALI,
TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI.
Digitally signed 3. VIKAS
by RENUKA
S/O LATE RAMU RATHOD,
Location: HIGH AGE: 22 YEARS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: PANEGAON,
TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI.
4. RAVINA
D/O LATE RAMU RATHOD,
AGE: 20 YEARS,
OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: PANEGAON,
TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SRINIVAS B. JOSHI, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:4747
RSA No. 200088 of 2025
HC-KAR
AND:
SHIVRAM S/O BHIMA RATHOD,
AGE: 57 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: PANEGAON,
TQ AND DIST: KALABURAGI.
...RESPONDENT
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF THE C.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2024 PASSED BY THE
DISTRICT JUDGE AND PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT
AT KALABURAGI IN R.A.NO.35/2024 DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
13.02.2024 IN O.S.NO.192/2021 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT KALABURAGI AND DECREE
THE SUIT AS PRAYED FOR, FURTHER PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS
SECOND APPEAL WITH COST AND GRANT SUCH OTHER
RELIEFS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEMS FIT UNDER THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED
THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC-K:4747
RSA No. 200088 of 2025
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR
AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant is absent.
This Court on 07.07.2025 has passed the following
order:
"Finally, two weeks' time is granted to comply with office objections.
In case of non-compliance, list this matter for further orders for dismissal for non- prosecution."
In spite of the said order, office objections have not
been complied with. It appears that the appellant is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE SDU
CT:VK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!