Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Syed Alemmullah vs Smt Muniyamma
2024 Latest Caselaw 22008 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22008 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Syed Alemmullah vs Smt Muniyamma on 30 September, 2024

                                                  -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC:40752-DB
                                                             CCC No. 903 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

                                              PRESENT
                         THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                 AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
                                    CCC NO. 903 OF 2024 (CIVIL)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SRI SYED ALEEMULLAH
                        S/O. LATE S.A. JALEEL,
                        AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
                        R/AT NO.13 AND 14, 7TH CROSS,
                        PANDURANGANAGAR,
                        BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
                        BENGALURU - 560 076.

                   2.   SRI ASWATHANARAYANASWAMY,
                        S/O. SRI MUNIYAPPA,
                        AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
                        R/AT KDICHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE,
                        BEGUR HOBLI, IIMB POST,
Digitally signed        BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
by VALLI                BANGALORE - 560 068.
MARIMUTHU
Location: High     3.   M/S. S.A. DEVELOPERS,
Court of                A PROPRIETARY CONCERN,
Karnataka
                        NO.950, 1ST FLOOR, 27TH 'A' MAIN,
                        9TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 069.

                        REPRESENTED BY
                        SRI SYED ALEEMULLAH
                        PRESENTLY NO.52/3, 2ND FLOOR,
                        RANKA COLONY ROAD,
                        NEXT TO EPITOME CRONE,
                        B.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 076.

                                                               ...COMPLAINANTS
                             -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC:40752-DB
                                     CCC No. 903 of 2024




(BY SRI NATARAJA H. T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   SMT. MUNIYAMMA
     W/O. MARAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,

2.   SMT. KRISHNAMMA,
     D/O. MARAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

3.   SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA
     D/O. MARAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

4.   SMT. MANGALA,
     D/O. MARAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

5.   SMT. KAVERAMMA,
     D/O. MARAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

     ACCUSED NOS.1 & 6 ARE
     R/AT BILEKAHALLI VILLAGE,
     BEGUR HOBLI,
     BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
     BENGALURU DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 560 076.
                                              ...ACCUSED
     THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN
PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE
COGNIZANCE OF THE OFFENCE COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED
NO.1 AND 4 AND TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE
DISOBEDIENCE OF THE INTERIM ORDER PASSED BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN RFA NO.2140/2019 ON 29.01.2020 IS AT
ANNEXURE-A AND TO AWARD THE COST OF THE PETITION.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                   -3-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:40752-DB
                                               CCC No. 903 of 2024




CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
       N. V. ANJARIA
       and
       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND


                           ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

It could not be disputed by learned advocate for the

complainants that the order which is brought under the contempt

jurisdiction is an interim order dated 29.01.2020 passed by the

Division Bench of this Court in Regular First Appeal. It required the

parties to maintain status quo until further orders.

2. If the breach of the aforesaid order is alleged, the remedy

available for either of the parties is before the same Court to file

appropriate application.

3. Leaving the complainants at liberty to move such application

in relation to breach of the interim order and further in view that the

order being the interim order does not determine the rights of the

NC: 2024:KHC:40752-DB

parties finally, the present contempt proceeding is not entertained.

It is accordingly disposed of, however, without expressing any

opinion on merits.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

DDU

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter