Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25936 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42702
MFA No. 3288 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3288 OF 2023 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
M/S BLAZE AND CENTRAL PVT LTD.,
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE
COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING REGISTERED
OFFICE AT NO.G-2, ELDORADO, 112,
NUNGUBAKKAM HIGH ROAD, MADRAS-14, AND
HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT CHANDROLOK,
5TH CROSS, GANDHINAGARA,
BENGALURU-560009
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
SRI.LALITH M. BIJLANI
...APPELLANT
Digitally signed
(BY SRI NAGENDRANATH N, ADVOCATE)
by DEVIKA M AND:
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
VISHVESHWARAIAH BUILDING,
3RD FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDI,
BENGALURU-560001
2. THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
(FORMERLY THE NATIONAL AIRPORT
AUTHORITY)REP. BY THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR,
BENGALURU AIRPORT, HAL,
BENGALURU-560017
...RESPONDENTS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42702
MFA No. 3288 of 2023
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND
ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 13.01.2023 PASSED IN LAC.NO.13/2004 ON THE
FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 19.07.2024 observed
that matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections
for fourth time and the counsel for the appellant again
sought for time and time was granted to comply with the
office objections on cost of Rs.2,000/- and also made it
clear that if cost is not paid and office objections are not
complied, the appeal will be listed for dismissal.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant
submits that the appellant did not turn up to comply the
office objections. Hence, this Court having taken note of
the fact that the matter is listed for fifth time for non-
NC: 2024:KHC:42702
compliance of office objections and cost has been paid but
office objections are not complied. Thus, it appears that
the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter
diligently. Hence, in view of the order dated 19.07.2024,
the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!