Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25354 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42832-DB
MFA No. 2932 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2932 OF 2017 (AA)
BETWEEN:
SRI.D.V.SATYANARAYANA,
S/O. LATE. D.S VASUDEVA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 15, 6TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS,
R .K. LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE,
PADMANABHA NAGAR,
BSK 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 070.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R.A.CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
(IA'S ARE DISPOSED OF)
AND:
Digitally
signed by K G M/S. GLOBAL ASSOCIATES,
RENUKAMBA H.M. GENEVA HOUSE,
Location: High NO. 14, CUNNINGHAM ROAD,
Court of BENGALURU - 560 052,
Karnataka REPRESENTED BY ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS,
SHRI. H.J. SIWANI AND SRI. M.J. SIWANI.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ABHINAV.R., ADVOCATE)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(B) OF THE
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT,1996 AGAINST THE
ORDER DATED 24.11.2016, PASSED IN A.A.NO.25/2007, ON
THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FILED
UNDER SECTION 9 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT
1996.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42832-DB
MFA No. 2932 of 2017
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant herein
challenging the order dated 24.11.2016 passed by the I
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City ('Trial
Court' in short) (CCH No.2) in A.A.No.25/2007.
2. Concedingly, the said application was filed under
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act
1996' in short).
3. Suffice to state, the application filed by the
appellant herein has been dismissed by the Trial Court.
4. We have been informed by the counsel for the
appellant that the appellant has expired. That apart, we have
also been informed that, the dispute between the parties, which
was referred to Arbitration, has resulted in an award, in favour
of the appellant.
NC: 2024:KHC:42832-DB
5. In fact, the challenge to the award by the sole
respondent has also been rejected by the Court deciding the
petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
of 1996. According to the learned counsel for the respondent,
an appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Act, 1996 but
the same has not been listed.
6. Be that as it may, in view of the aforesaid facts, the
appeal stands abated. Even otherwise, nothing further survives
for consideration in this appeal.
7. Pending I.A.Nos.1/2017, 2/2017 and 1/2022 do not
survive for consideration and stand disposed of.
Sd/-
(V KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE
Sd/-
(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE
SMC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!