Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25249 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42479
CRL.RP No. 816 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.816 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1. MR SIYAN SHARIEF
S/O MR. SHEIK AMANULLA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
H.NO. 268/2, SAATH MAZIL
GANDHI MAIDAN
KARKALA 574104
UDUPI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PARAMPARA MULTIPURPOSE
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
KARKALA 574104
REPRESENTED BY ITS ACCOUNTANT
Digitally MR. PRADEEP
signed by AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
MALATESH
S/O M.R NARAYANA DEVADIGA
KC
HERGA VILLAGE
Location: KARKALA 574 104
HIGH
COURT OF ...RESPONDENT
KARNATAKA (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401
CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN
APPEAL 4/2023 DATED 04.06.2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI (ITINERARY
SITTING AT KARKALA) AND THE JUDGMENT SENTENCE DATED
07.01.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
COURT, AT KARKALA, UDUPI IN C.C.NO.870/2018 AND
THEREBY REV. PETITIONER /ACCUSED WAS ACQUITTED FROM
THE OFFENCE U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42479
CRL.RP No. 816 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Joint Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the revision
petitioner which reads as under:
"The petitioner and respondent is hereby by agreed to settle the entire loan amount for Rs.12,00,000/- out of that said amount petitioner already deposited Rs.6,00,000/- in Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Karkala.
Petitioner is hereby agreed to pay the balance amount of Rs.6,00,000/- on or before 30.04.2025."
2. Placing the joint memo on record, petition stands
disposed of.
3. Amount in a sum of Rs.5,000/- ordered by the learned
Trial Judge to be paid towards defraying expenses of the State,
confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court is
hereby set-aside, as the lis is privy to the parties and no State
machinery is involved.
4. However, if the amount is not paid as agreed in the joint
memo, order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Judge
stands restored automatically.
NC: 2024:KHC:42479
5. The amount in deposit is permitted to be withdrawn by
the complainant, under due identification.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!