Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B G Naveen Kumar vs The Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 25184 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25184 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

B G Naveen Kumar vs The Director on 22 October, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                                      -1-
                                                              NC: 2024:KHC:42299
                                                            MFA No. 2827 of 2012




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

                                                BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2827 OF 2012 (MV)
                      BETWEEN:

                            B G NAVEEN KUMAR
                            S/O R GANGADHAR
                            AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
                            R/AT NO.6, 4TH B CROSS,
                            VINAYAKA NAGAR
                            KAMAKSHI PALYA
                            BENGALURU - 56 0079
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI.H.K.SATHEESH, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE DIRECTOR
                            ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE
                            INSURANCE CO LTD
Digitally signed by         RAGHAVENDRA COMPLEX,
PAVITHRA B
Location: HIGH              GROUND FLOOR 186/7, 1ST CROSS,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                   HOSUR MAIN ROAD, WILSON GARDEN
                            BENGALURU - 560 027

                      2.    K H GANGADHARA
                            S/O HANUMANTHAIAH
                            AGED MAJOR
                            R/O KALYA GATE
                            NEAR WATER TANK,
                            MAGADI TALUK
                            RAMANAGAR DISTRICT
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI.RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
                             -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:42299
                                      MFA No. 2827 of 2012




     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.11.2011
PASSED IN MVC NO.8929/2010 ON THE FILE OF MACT, 14TH
ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BANGALORE
CITY(SCCH.10) PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION     AND    SEEKING    ENHANCEMENT     OF
COMPENSATION IN TIME.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR


                       ORAL JUDGMENT

The present appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant

challenging the judgment and award dated 19.11.2011 in

MVC.No.8929/2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru, for seeking

enhancement of compensation.

2. The factum of accident and disability sustained

due to accident are not in dispute.

3. Heard the arguments from both sides and

perused the records.

4. The Tribunal has awarded compensation under

various heads as follows:

NC: 2024:KHC:42299

Pain and Suffering 15,000 For medical expenses and 17,000 other incidental charges Loss of amenities and future 5,000 discomfort Loss of earning during the 5,000 treatment Loss of future earning capacity 48,960 due to disability Future medical expenses 2,000

Total 92,960

5. From the medical evidence on record, the

claimant has suffered the following injuries:

i) Swelling and tenderness over left forearm and

hand

ii) Contused abrasion of left hand

iii) Fracture of the left forearm - Ulna bone

6. The Doctor has opined that injuries Nos.1 and 2

are simple in nature and injury No.3 is grievous in nature.

The claimant is working as a mechanic with R.N.Motors,

therefore, certainly the above injuries affects the mechanic

work.

NC: 2024:KHC:42299

7. Therefore, considering the nature of injuries

sustained by the claimant, the compensation awarded by

the Tribunal is on the lower side. Therefore, it is just and

proper to award additional global compensation of

Rs.80,000/-. Accordingly, the appellant/claimant is

entitled to additional global compensation of Rs.80,000/-,

in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal.

Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i. The appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii. The impugned judgment and award dated

19.11.2011 in MVC.No.8929/2010 passed by

the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court of

Small Causes, Bengaluru, is hereby modified to

the extent that the appellant/claimant is

entitled to additional global compensation of

Rs.80,000/- including interest, in addition to

what has been awarded by the Tribunal.

NC: 2024:KHC:42299

iii. No order as to costs.

iv. Registry is directed to transmit the TCR along

with copy of this order to the Tribunal forthwith.

v. The entire amount shall be released in favour of

the appellant/claimant.

vi. Draw award accordingly.

SD/-

(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

MDS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter