Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Pushpa vs Sri Muniraj K
2024 Latest Caselaw 25053 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25053 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt Pushpa vs Sri Muniraj K on 21 October, 2024

Author: N S Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N S Sanjay Gowda

                                       -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC:42910
                                                  MFA No. 4424 of 2019




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

                                     BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
            MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4424 OF 2019(MV-I)
            BETWEEN:

            SMT. PUSHPA,
            W/O SURESH,
            NOW AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
            RESIDING BONAGERE VILLAGE,
            BOMMANAYAKANAHALLI POST,
            BINDIGANVILE HOBLI,
            NAGAMANGALA TALUK,
            MANDYA DISTRICT.
                                                          ...APPELLANT
            (BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA N., ADVOCATE)

            AND:

            1.    SRI. MUNIRAJ K,
Digitally         S/O KRISHNAPPA,
signed by
KIRAN             MAJOR IN AGE,
KUMAR R           RESIDING AT METAKAL
Location:
HIGH              PALYA VILLAGE,
COURT OF          KENGERI HOBLI, NEAR BUS STOP,
KARNATAKA
                  BSK 6TH PHASE, 6TH BLOCK,
                  BENGALURU - 560 060.

            2.    THE BRANCH MANAGER,
                  TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE
                  COMPANY LTD.,
                  2ND FLOOR, AP & BEVI JAMBU
                  KESHAVA ARCADE, NO.69,
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:42910
                                      MFA No. 4424 of 2019




     MILLERS ROAD,
     BANGALORE - 560 052.
     REP:BY ITS MANAGER.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
    NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER
    DATED 05.09.2024)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.11.2018 PASSED IN MVC
NO.75/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
MACT, NAGAMANGALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

                     ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The claimant is in appeal being dissatisfied with the

compensation of Rs.3,65,556/- awarded by the Tribunal.

The claimant is also aggrieved by the reduction of 50% of

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

2. The Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the

rider of the motorcycle with which the car collided in which

the claimant was traveling ought to have been impleaded

as a respondent as he had also contributed to the

accident.

NC: 2024:KHC:42910

3. It is settled law that the claimant is entitled to

choose the offender against whom he/she intends to

proceed against. The finding of the Tribunal therefore, that

compensation has to be deducted to the extent of 50%

cannot be sustained, as the rider of the motorcycle was

not necessary to be impleaded and the same is set aside.

4. Insofar as the amount of compensation awarded, it is

noticed that the Tribunal has determined the notional

income at Rs.8,000/-. In my view, since there is no

evidence to ascertain the actual income, notional income

of Rs.8,500/- has to be applied as per the determination

made by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority for

accidents of the year 2012.

5. The Tribunal assessed the whole body disability at

14%. Having regard to the evidence of the doctor, in my

view, this assessment of disability at 14% cannot be found

fault with.

NC: 2024:KHC:42910

6. As the claimant was aged 25 years, a multiplier of

'18' will have to be applied. Consequently, the claimant

would be entitled to a sum of Rs.2,57,040/-

(Rs.8,500X18X12X14%) towards 'loss of future

income'.

7. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.88,636/-

towards 'medical bills' and Rs.15,000/- towards 'future

medical expenses'. In my opinion, since they are based

on the documentary evidence and the evidence of the

doctor, the said sums are appropriate.

8. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.25,000/- towards

'conveyance, food and attendant charges'. In my view, it

is just and proper and do not call for any interference by

this Court.

9. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.20,000/- towards 'pain

and sufferings' but has not awarded any sums towards

'loss of amenities'.

NC: 2024:KHC:42910

10. Having regard to the hospitalization and the actual

disability suffered by the claimant, it would be appropriate

to award Rs.50,000/- towards 'pain and sufferings'

and Rs.50,000/- towards 'loss of amenities'.

11. Consequently, the award of the Tribunal is modified

and the claimant would be entitled to the following

compensation:

                                         As           As
                                      awarded      awarded
  Sl.     Compensation under
                                       by the       by this
  No.       different Heads
                                      Tribunal       Court

                                       (Rs.)        (Rs.)

   1.     Loss of future income       2,41,920      2,57,040

   2.     Medical bills                 88,636       88,636

   3.     Pain and sufferings           20,000       50,000

          Future medical                15,000       15,000
   4.
          expenses

   5.     Loss of amenities                    -     50,000

          Conveyance, food,             25,000       25,000
   6.     nourishment and
          attendant charges

                    Total             3,65,556     4,85,676

                                            NC: 2024:KHC:42910





12. Thus, the claimant is held entitled to the total

compensation of Rs.4,85,676/- as against

Rs.3,65,556/-, along with interest at the rate of 6% per

annum from the date of petition till its realization.

13. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the

amount of compensation awarded within two months from

the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

14. The disbursement of the compensation amount shall

be in terms of the award of the Tribunal.

15. This appeal is accordingly allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter