Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27701 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:47137
CRL.P No. 10672 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10672 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. MR HARISH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
S/O MR SRIDHAR NAIDU
R/AT SRI VENATESHWARA NILAYAM
NO 62, 1ST BLOCK
BETHAMANGALA TOWN
BETHAMANGALA
KOLAR - 563 116.
2. SRI SRIDHARA NAIDU
AGED MAJOR
R/AT SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYAM
NO 62, 1ST BLOCK
BETHAMANGALA TOWN
BETHAMANGALA
KOLAR - 563 116.
Digitally signed by 3. SMT REVATHI BAI
KAVYA G AGED MAJOR
Location: High R/AT SRI VENATESHWARA NILAYAM
Court of Karnataka
NO 62, 1ST BLOCK
BETHAMANGALA TOWN
BETHAMANGALA
KOLAR - 563 116.
4. SMT LALITH KUMAR S.,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
S/O SRIDHAR NAIDU
R/AT SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYAM
NO 62, 1ST BLOCK
BETHAMANGALA TOWN
BETHAMANGALA
KOLAR - 563 116.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:47137
CRL.P No. 10672 of 2023
5. SMT P. TEJASWINI
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
S/O MR SRIDHAR NAIDU
R/AT SRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYAM
NO 62, 1ST BLOCK
BETHAMANGALA TOWN
BETHAMANGALA
KOLAR - 563 116.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR R.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE BY PAVAGADA POLICE STATION
REP BY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
2. SMT AISHWARYA P.S.,
W/O MR HARISH KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
R/AT YOGAMANDIRA
JAIN LAYOUT, PAVAGADA TOWN.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FIR NO.150/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL
CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC COURT, PAVAGADA TUMKUR
DISTRICT INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AT
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:47137
CRL.P No. 10672 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
Learned HCGP on instructions would submit that the
charges have been framed and the petition would not be
entertainable at this juncture.
2. In the light of the charges being framed, the
entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of
the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR
KUMAR1.
3. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such
remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
(1994) 4 SCC 142
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!