Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 27653 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:46916-DB
CCC No. 905 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
CCC NO. 905 OF 2023 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI B. VENKATESH RAJU
S/O LATE N. BHOJARAJU
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT DOOR NO.92, 6TH CROSS,
RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR EXTENSION,
MYSORE - 570 011.
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI R. SUMUKH SHASTRY, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI K. SATISH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by AND:
PRABHAKAR
SWETHA 1. DR. M. N. AJAY NAGABHUSHAN, I.A.S.
KRISHNAN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
Location:
High Court of DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Karnataka VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2. SRI G. T. DINESH KUMAR K. A. S
THE COMMISSIONER,
MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:46916-DB
CCC No. 905 of 2023
JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD,
CHAMRAJAPURA, LAKSHMIPURAM,
MYSORE - 570 005.
...ACCUSED
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
VIKASA SOUDHA,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
...PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AAG A/W
SRI K.S. HARISH, GA FOR ACCUSED NOS.1 & 3 AND
SRI T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR ACCUSED No.2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO
INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED
AND PUNISH THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING
WILLFULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.5213/2023 DATED
07.03.2023 (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:46916-DB
CCC No. 905 of 2023
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
N. V. ANJARIA
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
Learned advocate Mr. T.P. Vivekananda for respondent No.2
stated that the compliance affidavit is filed.
2. Learned advocate Mr. R. Sumukh Shastry for learned
advocate Mr. K. Satish for the complainant could not dispute the
factum that the endorsement is issued to carry out the directions of
learned Single Judge.
3. In the above view, the contempt proceedings does not
survive. It is disposed of accordingly.
However, liberty is reserved for the complainant to challenge
the endorsement/order, if the complainant is not satisfied with the
merits of the order by instituting appropriate independent
NC: 2024:KHC:46916-DB
proceedings. This Court does not express any opinion on merits in
that regard.
Sd/-
(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
CR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!