Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandrashekhar Shivappa Managuli vs Irappa Hanamappa Awaradi
2024 Latest Caselaw 12080 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12080 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Chandrashekhar Shivappa Managuli vs Irappa Hanamappa Awaradi on 30 May, 2024

                                            -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:7219
                                                   CRL.RP No. 100053 of 2018




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                           DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
                                         BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
                 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100053 OF 2018 (397)
                BETWEEN:

                CHANDRASHEKHAR SHIVAPPA MANAGULI,
                AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
                R/O: WARD NO.1, MUDHOL,
                DIST: BAGALKOT.


                                                                 ...PETITIONER

                (BY SMT.CHITRA GOUDALKAR, ADVOCATE FOR
                 SRI S.B.HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                IRAPPA HANAMAPPA AWARADI,
                AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                R/O: WARD NO.V, MUDHOL,
                DIST: BAGALKOT.


CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
                                                               ...RESPONDENT
KATTIMANI       (BY SRI GIRISH A. YADAWAD, ADVOCATE)

                     THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
HIGH            SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
COURT OF        THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION FOR OFFENCE U/S.138 OF N.I.ACT
KARNATAKA       DATED 06.01.2007 PASSED IN C.C.NO.384/2005 ON THE FILE OF
                THE ADDL. JMFC, MUDHOL, WHICH IS CONFIRMED BY THE LEARNED
                I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT, SITTING AT
                JAMAKHANDI IN CRL.A.NO.8/2007 DATED 19.02.2018 AND ACQUIT
                THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED BY SETTING ASIDE THE ABOVE SAID
                JUDGMENTS.


                     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,
                THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                 -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:7219
                                      CRL.RP No. 100053 of 2018




                              ORDER

The learned counsel for the respective parties filed

application under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. and submitted that

the matter has been settled amicably between the parties,

considering the averments of the application and the

affidavit, the matter may be disposed of in terms of the

settlement.

2. The learned counsel for the respective parties

present. The complainant and the accused are also present.

3. Today, the accused had paid a sum of

Rs.3,00,000/- to the complainant. The complainant accepted

the same and acknowledged the amount having received.

Both the parties have filed application along with affidavit.

Paragraph-3 of the said application reads thus:

"3. It is submitted that the respondent has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- towards full and final settlement in respect of the complaint filed by him. Out of the said amount of Rs.6,00,000/-, an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- is deposited by the petitioner on 02.12.2023 under receipt No.96599 before the trial court in (C.C.No.384/2005 on the file of the Addl.JMFC, Mudhol) in pursuance of the order dated 20.11.2023

NC: 2024:KHC-D:7219

passed by this Hon'ble High Court in the top noted petition. It is agreed by the parties that the said amount of Rs.3,00,000/- shall be withdrawn by the respondent. It is submitted that the remaining amount of Rs.3,00,000/- (rupees three lakhs only) has been paid today by the petitioner to the respondent (i.e. on 30.05.2024) by way of cash. The respondent hereby acknowledges receipt of the said amount."

4. After having perused the said application and

averments, there is no embargo to this Court to record the

compromise as the alleged offence is compoundable in

nature. It is needless to say that encouraging the parties for

settlement in a summary proceedings needs to be

implemented as a part of reconciliation process. Accordingly,

I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

The petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise.

The judgment and order dated 19.02.2018 passed by the I Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot to sit at Jamkhandik at Jamkhandi in Criminal Appeal No.8/2007 confirming the judgment and order dated 06.01.2007 passed by the Addl.JMFC, Mudhol in C.C.No.384/2005 are

NC: 2024:KHC-D:7219

hereby set aside as the matter has been compromised between the parties.

The petitioner is acquitted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Bail bonds, if any, stands cancelled.

The Trial Court is directed to release the amount in favour of the complainant after production of this order.

Sd/-

JUDGE

CLK CT:ANB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter