Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11474 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:17159
RSA No. 779 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MAY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 779 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. G. MAHADEVAIAH,
S/O LATE GANGANNA @ GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
2. SMT. RATHNAMMA,
W/O LATE YOGISH,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
3. SRI. H.S. MANJUNATH,
S/O LATE SHIVALINGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
4. SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH,
S/O LATE GANGANNA @ GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
5. SRI. NANDISH,
Digitally S/O LATE YAKARAJ,
signed by H AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
K HEMA
Location: APPELLANTS 1 TO 8 ALL ARE
High Court RESIDENTS OF HESARAHALLI VILLAGE,
of Karnataka
NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK,
TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 126.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MANU SHANKAR S.S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. PARVATHAMMA,
W/O LATE NAJUNDAIAH,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:17159
RSA No. 779 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
2. SRI. H.N. GANGADHAR,
S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3. SMT. VIJAYA,
D/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
4. SRI. H.N. KUMARASWAMY,
S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE
ALL RESIDENTS OF HESARAHALLI VILLAGE,
NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK,
TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 126.
5. SMT. RUDRAMMA,
W/O LATE SHANMUKHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
RESIDENTS OF HESARAHALLI VILLAGE
NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK
TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572 126.
6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
HEMAVATHI CANAL DIVISION,
KUNIGAL ROAD, TUMKURU - 572 101.
7. THE THASILDHAR,
GUBBI TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 216.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.02.2024 PASSED IN
RA NO.4/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AND SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.11.2022 PASSED
ON I.A.NO.IV IN OS.NO.83/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:17159
RSA No. 779 of 2024
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI, ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED
UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF
PLAINT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
which reads as follows:
"The counsel for appellants prays that this Hon'ble court be pleased to permit the appellants to convert the regular Second appeal (RSA) in to Miscellaneous second appeal (MSA) in the interest of justice and equity"
2. In view of the same, the appellants are permitted to
convert the present Regular Second Appeal into a Miscellaneous
Second Appeal.
3. The present Regular Second Appeal is disposed off
for statistical purpose. Learned counsel for the appellants to do
the needful regarding conversion before the Registry within
two weeks.
SD/-
JUDGE
ABK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!