Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinay S/O Dhanu Gouda vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 6717 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6717 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Vinay S/O Dhanu Gouda vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 March, 2024

                                                             -1-
                                                                   NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011
                                                                   CRL.P No. 100625 of 2024




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                                         DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

                                                         BEFORE

                                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI

                                       CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100625 OF 2024 (439)

                               BETWEEN:

                               VINAY S/O DHANU GOUDA,
                               AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                               R/O MELINKERE MUDGA,
                               KARWAR-581324.
                                                                               -     PETITIONER
                               (BY SRI. ABHISHEK L KALLED, ADVOCATE)

                               AND:

                               1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED
                                    BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
                                    WOMEN POLICE STATION, KARWAR,
                                    UTTARA KANNADA, THROUGH
                                    STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                                    HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH DHARWAD.

                               2.   RANJITA RAJU NAIK, AGE: 33 YEARS,
VINAYAKA                            OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O PALEKARWAR,
BV                                  TODUR, AMDALLI, KARWAR,
                                    UTTARA KANNADA-581324.
Digitally signed by VINAYAKA
BV                                                                         -       RESPONDENTS
Location: HIGH COURT OF
KARNATAKA,DHARWAD
BENCH
                               (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1;
Date: 2024.03.12 11:45:04
+0530                          R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

                                     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
                               SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.1 ON
                               REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO. 22/2023 REGISTERED BY THE KARWAR
                               WOMEN POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 363,
                               342, 376, 376(N), 201 OF THE IPC AND U/S 4, 6 AND 21 OF THE
                               POCSO ACT & ETC.

                                     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
                               DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011
                                      CRL.P No. 100625 of 2024




                             ORDER

The petitioner has filed the present petition U/s 439 of

Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in connection with Uttara

Kannada Women Police Station Crime No. 22/2023 for the

offences punishable U/s 363 and 342 of IPC.

2. Parties to the petition are referred with their ranks as

assigned in the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

3. Heard the arguments of both sides.

4. After hearing arguments of both sides and on perusal of

the records, the following points arise for consideration.

i) Whether petitioner is entitled for regular bail in terms of Sec. 439 of Cr.P.C.?

ii) What order?

5. On perusal of the complaint filed by Smt.Ranjita wife of

Raju Naika, it would go to show that her daughter, the victim

over phone informed that she is going to attend the marriage of

persons known to the family and she allowed for going to the

said marriage. The victim was pursuing her education by

studying in grandmother's house at Todur. The victim was not

reachable after she went to the marriage. On 05.07.2023 the

District Child Welfare Department officials informed over phone

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011

that daughter of complainant is in Child Protection Home and

asked to attend the meeting on 25.07.2023. The complainant

attended the said meeting and met her daughter. On enquiry,

the daughter of complainant has disclosed that she was in love

with accused, resident of Melinakeri village, Muduga, Karwar

District. Complainant and her husband were unaware of the

said fact and the victim stayed in the house of accused for

about two months. On receipt of the said complaint, criminal

law was set into motion by registering case in Crime No.

22/2023 for the offences punishable U/s 363, 342 of IPC. The

investigating officer having carried out investigation, has filed

the charge sheet.

6. Learned HCGP has objected for grant of bail by filing

objections contending that victim is a minor and her consent

becomes irrelevant. There is sufficient evidence against the

accused to substantiate the allegations made against him.

7. On perusal of the statement of the victim it would go to

show that there were matrimonial differences between her

father and mother. The father of victim who is addicted to

alcohol, is residing separately. The father of victim was

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011

assaulting and abusing the victim when she demanded money

to go to the school and therefore she came to her mother. The

mother of the victim arranged her daughter to stay in the

house of grandmother and the victim from there was pursuing

her studies. In the last week of June while the victim was

staying in the house of accused, the accused has committed

penetrative sexual assault against her will.

8. Learned HCGP has produced the records of investigation

which would go to show that victim has given her statement

before the Magistrate U/s 164 of Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated

that she was in love with the accused and she stayed in the

house of accused in spite of the parents asked victim to go to

her house. However, victim declined to go to her house and

continued to stay in the house of accused. The family

members of the accused were forced to give shelter to the

victim under threat that she is going to die. Thereafter, the

District Welfare Department Committee Officials have come to

the house of the accused and brought her to the Child

Protection Home.

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011

9. The date of birth of the victim as per the school records is

11.12.2007 and as on the date of filing of complaint on

01.08.2023, the victim was aged about 16 years 4 months and

odd days. The statement of victim given before Smt.Kalpana

S. Sail, Woman ASI of Women Police Station, Karwar,

statement given before the Magistrate U/s 164 of Cr.P.C. would

go to show that victim was in love with accused and she

continued to stay in the house of accused inspite of the family

members of accused asking her to go to her parental house.

The records produced in this case would go to show that victim

was in love with the accused and on her own accord she stayed

in the house of the accused.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner in support of his

contention that the victim was in love with the accused and

moved on her own accord, is entitled for bail relied on the Co-

ordinate bench judgment of this Court in Puttappa @ Putta

son of Manjappa Vs. State of Karnataka (Crl. P. No.

9797/2017 dated 27.04.2018) wherein in the said case also

when the victim was in love with the accused and stayed with

the accused, bail has been granted. On the same principle,

reliance is also placed on the Co-ordinate bench judgment of

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011

this Court in Deepak son of Fakirappa Chalawadi Vs. State

of Karnataka (Crl. P. No. 100505/2021 dated

03.06.2021). In the said case also the victim was aged about

16 years and she moved with the accused on her own accord.

Since she is now age of understanding consequence of her acts

bail has been granted.

11. In the present case also the victim has stayed in the

house of accused on her own accord and there is no evidence

of the accused having committed forcible sexual assault on the

victim. The entire investigation is completed and charge sheet

is filed. Whether the accused has committed penetrated sexual

assault against the will of the victim is a matter of trial. The

accused is in judicial custody since from the date of his arrest.

Therefore, under these circumstances accused is entitled for

bail. Consequently, proceed to pass the following order.

ORDER

The bail petition filed by petitioner U/s 439 of Cr.P.C. is

hereby allowed.

The accused is ordered to be released on bail on his

executing personal bond and surety bond for a sum of

NC: 2024:KHC-D:5011

Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the likesum to the

satisfaction of the trial court, subject to following conditions:

1) Accused shall produce address proof documents of

himself and that of his surety subject to police verification.

2) Accused shall not leave jurisdiction of the trial court

without prior permission.

3) Accused shall appear before the trial Court on every date

of hearing unless he is otherwise exempted.

4) Accused shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses

in any manner.

Sd/-

JUDGE BVV CT:GSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter