Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Radha vs Umesh K S
2024 Latest Caselaw 6171 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6171 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Radha vs Umesh K S on 1 March, 2024

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                            -1-
                                                       NC: 2024:KHC:8763
                                                    MFA No. 5258 of 2016




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5258 OF 2016(MV-I)
                BETWEEN:

                RADHA W/O SWAMYGOWDA,
                AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
                RESIDING AT: ILLENAHALLI VILLAGE,
                CHINAKURALI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK,
                MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434.
                                                            ...APPELLANT
                (BY SRI. GURUDEV PRASAD.K.T., ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.     UMESH.K.S.
                       S/O SWAMYGOWDA,
                       MAJOR, R/A KADABA VILLAGE,
                       CHINAKURALI HOBLI,
                       PANDAVAPURA TALUK,
                       MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434.
Digitally signed by
THEJASKUMAR N 2.    BHARATHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
Location: HIGH      NO.32951/A D 29/1, 1ST FLOOR,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA           TEMPLE ROAD, KALIDASA CIRCLE,
                    V.V.MOHALLA, MYSORE-570 002.
                    BY ITS MANAGER.
                                                        ...RESPONDENTS
                (BY SMT. V.VETRI LAXSHMI., ADVOCATE FOR
                    SRI. VASANTHAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                    SRI. ANUP SEETHARAM., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

                     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
                SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
                AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:07.04.2015
                                  -2-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:8763
                                              MFA No. 5258 of 2016




PASSED IN MVC NO.1472/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, PANDAVAPURA.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                     JUDGMENT

Smt.V.Vetri Laxshmi., learned counsel on behalf of

Sri.Vasanthappa., for respondent No.1 and Sri.Anup

Seetharam., learned counsel for respondent No.2 have

appeared in person.

Though the appeal is listed today for admission, with the

consent of learned counsel for the respective parties, it is heard

finally.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be

referred to as per their status and rankings before the Tribunal.

3. It is the case of the claimant that on the 20th day of

February 2012 at about 4:00 p.m., when the claimant was

traveling as pillion rider in a Hero Honda Passion Plus bearing

Registration No.KA-11-S-9602 rode by her friend by name

Suresha from Illenhally towards Kodagahalli in Chinakurali -

Melukote road near Ideal International Public School at Sanaba

Extension, a Goods Auto bearing Registration No.KA-11-A-2427

came in a rash and negligent manner and hit claimant's bike.

NC: 2024:KHC:8763

Due to the impact, the claimant fell down and sustained

grievous injuries to head, leg and other parts of the body.

Immediately she was treated at Government Hospital,

Pandavapura, after getting first aid she was shifted to Vikram

Jeev Hospital, Mysore and thereafter took treatment as an in-

patient in K.R Hospital, Mysore, in total she took treatment as

in-patient for twenty days. Contending that the accident

occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the Goods Auto,

the claimant filed claim petition seeking compensation.

In response to the notice, respondents appeared through

their counsel. The first respondent did not file written

statement. The second respondent filed written statement and

denied the petition averments. It admitted that the offending

vehicle was insured with it and liability was subject to the terms

and conditions of the policy. Among other grounds it prayed for

dismissal of the petition.

Based on the above pleadings, the Tribunal framed

issues. The parties led evidence and marked the documents.

The Tribunal vide judgment dated:07.04.2015 partly allowed

the claim petition. It is this Judgment that is called into

question in this appeal on several grounds as set-out in the

Memorandum of appeal.

NC: 2024:KHC:8763

Learned counsel for the respective parties urged several

contentions. Heard, the contentions urged on behalf of

respective parties and perused the appeal papers and also the

records with utmost care.

4. The point that would arise for consideration is

whether the Claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation?

5. The facts are sufficiently stated and do not require

reiteration. The Claimant's appeal is one for enhancement of

compensation and modification of the judgment. The grounds

urged in the present appeal are mainly relating to the meager

compensation awarded under different heads by the Tribunal.

The Claimant has suffered pain and agony owing to the injuries

sustained in the accident in question. Hence, this Court deems

it appropriate to award Rs.15,210/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand

Two Hundred and Ten only) towards Food, diet, nourishment as

against Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only).

The amount of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand

only) towards pain, shock and agony and Rs.20,790/- (Rupees

Twenty Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety only) towards

Medical expenses awarded by the Tribunal remains intact.

NC: 2024:KHC:8763

Similarly, this Court deems it appropriate to award

Rs.14,000/- (Rupees Fourteen Thousand only) towards loss of

income during laid up period as against Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand only) and Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand

only) towards disappointment and discomfort and loss of

amenities as against Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand

only) awarded by the Tribunal.

6. Accordingly, this Court re-determines the

compensation as under:-

1. Pain and Sufferings 30,000/- Rs.30,000/-

2. Medical Expenses 20,790/- Rs.20,790/-

3. Food, diet, nourishment, 10,000/- + 5,210/- Rs.15,210/-

conveyance and other incidental expenses.

4. Loss of income during 7,000 X 2 Rs.14,000/-

laid up period.

5. Disappointment and 15,000 + 5,000/- Rs.20,000/-

discomfort and loss of amenities.

                                                       Total:    Rs.1,00,000/-
                (Less) Compensation awarded by the              (-) Rs.85,790/-
                                                 Tribunal:
           Enhanced compensation awarded by this                Rs.14,210/-
                                                       Court:

                                                            NC: 2024:KHC:8763





Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and the prevailing rate of interest during the relevant time, this

Court deems it appropriate to award interest at the rate of 6%

per annum on the enhanced compensation amount from the

date of claim petition till realization.

7. Hence, the following:

ORDER

1. The Miscellaneous First appeal is

allowed in part and the Judgment dated:

07.04.2015 passed by the Court of Senior Civil

Judge & JMFC, Pandavapura in M.V.C

No.1472/2012 is modified to the extent stated

hereinabove.

2. The claimant is entitled for the enhanced

compensation of Rs.14,210/- (Rupees Fourteen

Thousand Two Hundred and Ten only) with interest

at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the

claim petition till the date of realization.

3. The second respondent - Insurance

Company shall deposit the enhanced compensation

NC: 2024:KHC:8763

amount along with 6% interest within a period of

two months from the date of receipt of the certified

copy of this Judgment.

4. The Registry to draw the modified award

accordingly.

5. Office is directed to transmit the original

records to the concerned Tribunal forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter