Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 14524 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4260-DB
WA No. 200008 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
WRIT APPEAL NO. 200008 OF 2023 (LR)
BETWEEN:
S.S. HASSAN NIZAMI SARMAST
S/O S.S ASADULLAH SARMAST,
AGE: 65 YEARS,
OCC. AGRICULTURE AND PENSIONER,
R/O SAGAR (B), TQ. SHAHAPUR,
AT PRESENT R/O H.NO. 4-601/23/2/10,
OPP. BAREY HILL MOHAMMED COLONY,
GULMOHAR HILL, KALABURAGI - 585 104.
...APPELLANT
Digitally signed by (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA K., ADVOCATE)
BASALINGAPPA
SHIVARAJ
DHUTTARGAON AND:
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
LAND REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS,
VIDHAN SOUDHA,
BENGALURU -560 001.
2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL
SHAHAPUR, TQ. SHAHPUR,
DISTRICT: YADGIRI -585201,
THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4260-DB
WA No. 200008 of 2023
3. THE TAHASILDAR
LAND REFORMS SHAHAPUR,
TQ. SHAHAPUR,
DISTRICT: YADGIR - 585 201.
4. GANGAPPA S/O CHANDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O SAGAR (B), TQ. SHAHAPUR,
DISTRICT: YADGIR - 585201.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 03.02.2022, IN WP NO.200110/16 PASSED BY
THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND CONSEQUENTLY TO QUASH
THE IMPUNGED ORDER OF LAND TRIBUNAL DATED
28.11.1987, AS PER ANNEXURE-B. TO ISSUE ANY OTHER
DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS EITHER BY REMANDING TO MATTER
TO THE LAND TRIBUNAL SHAHAPUR TO HOLD AN ENQUIRY
AND PASS THE APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT AFTER RECORDING
THE EVIDENCE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
RAJESH RAI K.J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None appears for the appellant. Though this appeal is
filed on 12.12.2022 and sufficient opportunities were
granted to the appellant to comply with the office
objections, the appellant has not complied with the office
objections.
NC: 2024:KHC-K:4260-DB
This appeal was listed on 18.06.2024 and one week
time was granted to comply with the office objections,
failing which, it was ordered that the appeal will be listed
for dismissal.
As per order dated 18.06.2024, today the appeal is
listed for dismissal. It seems that the appellant is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
VNR
CT:BN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!