Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15638 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:24949
RSA No. 1552 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1552 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. NANJAMMA
(DEAD BY LRS)
1(a) DEVEERAMMA
D/O LATE NANJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
RESIDING AT TERAKANAMBI
HUNDI VILLAGE
GUNDLUPET TALUK
1(b) ERAMMA
(DEAD BY LRS)
1(b.1) NAGAPPA
Digitally signed
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH 1(b.2) VEERABADRAPPA
COURT OF AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
KARNATAKA
1(b.3) G.N.MALLESHA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI
GUNDLUPET TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR
1(c) DEVAMMA
D/O LATE NANJAMMA
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:24949
RSA No. 1552 of 2021
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT UDIGALA VILLAGE
HARAVE HOBLI
CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK
1(d) SHIVAMMA
D/O LATE NANJAMMA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI
GUNDLUPET TALUK
2. MAHADEVAPPA
S/O LATE SOMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
3. VEERAPPA
S/O LATE SOMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
4. SHIVAPPA
S/O LATE SOMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
APPELLANTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE
RESIDING AT GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI
GUNDLUPET TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR
...APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. SUMATHI S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. CHIKKAMADAPPA
(DEAD BY LRS)
1(a) SAKAMMA
W/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:24949
RSA No. 1552 of 2021
1(b) SURESHA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
1(c) RAMESHA
S/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GURUVINAPURA VILLAGE
TERAKANAMBI HOBLI
GUNDLUPET TALUK
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2020
PASSED IN R.A.NO.07/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET ,DISMISSING THE
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 31.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.104/2009 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLUPET.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has not complied with
the office objections and also not paid the cost.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance
of office objections and non-payment of cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!