Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 783 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1033
RFA No. 1320 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1320 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. P. KUMARSWAMY,
S/O PATHIAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
NO.5, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, CHOLURPALYA,
MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 023.
2. SRI. H.R. CHIKKARANGASWAMY,
S/O LATE H.R. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
3. SRI. H.R. DEVARAJA,
S/O LATE H.R. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/A NO.390,
Digitally signed by NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE,
VIJAYALAKSHMI
BN CHANDRA NAGARA, KAMALANAGARA,
Location: High
Court of 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 079.
Karnataka
4. SMT. H.R. BHAGYALAKSHMI,
D/O LATE H.R. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
BEGUR VILLAGE AND POST,
KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 130.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. KRISHNA MURTHY M.R, ADVOCATE AND
SRI. SWAMY SHIVA PRAKASH H, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1033
RFA No. 1320 of 2014
AND:
1. SRI. PATHIYAPPA,
S/O LATE MUDALAGIRIGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS,
2. SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/O PATHIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 1409/8
1ST B MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040.
3. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA,
D/O PATHIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
MALLADEVANAHALLI VILLAGE,
DODDAMALLIGE POST,
MAYSANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK,
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 221.
4. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI,
D/O PATHIAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
NO.121, 11TH CROSS,
NEAR SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE
KEB ROAD, GANESH FARM,
AMJANANAGARA, VISWANEEDAM POST,
BANGALORE - 560 091.
5. SMT. GANGAMMA,
D/O PATHIAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
NO.53, THIMMARAYAGOWDA LAYOUT,
ITTAMADU, BANGALORE - 560 085.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:1033
RFA No. 1320 of 2014
6. SMT. SUSHELAMMA,
D/O PATHIAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
NO.593, 3RD CROSS ROAD,
NEAR MAHADESWARA TEMPLE,
RANGANATHAPURA, KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BANGALORE - 560 079.
...RESPONDENTS
(VIDE ORDER DATED 09.09.2023 R3 AND R4
ARE CALLED OUT AND ABSENT)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2011 PASSED IN
O.S.356/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL
JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a
memo dated 03.01.2024 signed by the appellants stating that
the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal since
the matter has been settled before the Trial Court in FDP
No.28/2019.
2. Memo is placed on record.
NC: 2024:KHC:1033
3. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of the
memo.
4. In view of the disposal of the main matter, I.A
No.1/2014 does not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
VS
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!