Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Ravi .M vs The Assistant Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 495 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 495 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Ravi .M vs The Assistant Commissioner on 5 January, 2024

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                               -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC:642
                                                        WP No. 13535 of 2023




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                        DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 13535 OF 2023 (LR)
                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI. RAVI .M,
                   S/O LATE MURALIDHARAN A.G,
                   AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
                   NO.10 CMC., COMPLEX,
                   RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
                   B.C.H. ROAD,
                   BENGALURU- 560098
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. K R LINGARAJU., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
Digitally signed        MYSURU SUB-DIVISION,
by JUANITA              MYSURU-570001.
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF           2.   THE TAHSILDAR,
KARNATAKA
                        MYSURU TALUK,
                        MUSURU-570001.
                                                             ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP)

                          THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
                   AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
                   QUASH THE ORDER IN CASE NO.LRF. 79A, B 132/09-10 DTD
                   06.09.2010 PASSED BY THE R1 VIDE ANENXURE-A AND
                              -2-
                                            NC: 2024:KHC:642
                                       WP No. 13535 of 2023




DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO RESTORE OR ENTER THE NAME OF
PETITIONER WITH RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY.NO.79/1D
MEASURING 18 GUNTAS AND LAND BEARING SY.NO.79/3
MEASURING 1 ACRE 05 GUNTAS BOTH THE LANDS ARE
SITUATED     AT   SARKARIUTHANAHALLI     VILLAGE,    VARUNA
HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT AND ETC.,

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                           ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of forfeiture

dated 06.09.2010 passed by the Assistant Commissioner,

Mysuru Sub-Division, Mysuru under the provisions of

Section 83 for violation of the provisions contained in

Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms

Act, 1961.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has

been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice

to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar

circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

NC: 2024:KHC:642

W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021

remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner

for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of

hearing to the aggrieved person.

3. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka

Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no

proceedings were pending before any Court/authority.

4. Learned HCGP points out from the impugned

order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and

in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not

appear before the Assistant Commissioner.

5. It is the contention of the learned HCGP that

even as per the materials available on record, after

forfeiture, the excess lands have been granted by the

State Government to third parties. The Assistant

Commissioner is therefore required to ascertain, whether

the forfeited lands still remain with the State Government

or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have

been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section

NC: 2024:KHC:642

12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the

proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-

section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply

and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by

the Assistant Commissioner.

6. Having considered the submission of the

learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-

ordinate Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that

facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite

similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co-

ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein.

7. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The

impugned order dated 06.09.2010 passed by the Assistant

Commissioner in LRF No.79A, B 132/09-10 is hereby

quashed and set aside. The matter is remanded back to

the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the

case of the petitioner including the consequences of the

subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of

NC: 2024:KHC:642

Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms

Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020.

8. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-

Assistant Commissioner on 30th January 2024, without

waiting for further notice from the Assistant

Commissioner.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

JT/-

CT:JL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter