Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.S.Kuppuswamy vs M/S. Karnataka State Financial ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 469 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 469 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri.S.Kuppuswamy vs M/S. Karnataka State Financial ... on 5 January, 2024

Author: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry

Bench: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry

                                          -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC:648-DB
                                                   MFA No. 9198 of 2015




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                       DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
                                       PRESENT
                    THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
                                          AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
               MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9198 OF 2015 (SFC)


               BETWEEN:

               SRI.S.KUPPUSWAMY
               S/O SIVANANDAM,
               NO.155/1, ARMSTRONG ROAD,
                BENGALURU-560 001

                                                            ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI. R K KOTHANDAPANI., ADVOCATE)


               AND:

Digitally      1.    M/S. KARNATAKA STATE
signed by
VEENA
KUMARI B
                     FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Location:
High Court
                     HEAD OFFICE AT NO.1/1
of Karnataka
                     THIMMAIAH ROAD,
                     NEAR CONTONMENT RAILWAY STATION,
                     VASANTHNAGAR,
                     BENGALURU-560 052

               2.    M/S. VEEAAR TYPES ON LINE (P) LTD
                     NO.158/2 ARMSTRONG ROAD,
                     BENGALURU-560 001
                     AND ALSO AT NO.331 (1ST FLOOR)
                     II STAGE BINNAMANGALA EXTENSION,
                            -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC:648-DB
                                   MFA No. 9198 of 2015




     INDIRANAGAR,
     BENGALURU -560038.

3.   SRI.V.DALAPATHY
     S/O VENKATESHULU,
     C/O SRI.VIJAYANAGAR SAMSKRUTHI,
     VIDYA PEETHA, IST MAIN ROAD,
     MARUTHINAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 072

4.   S.BALASUBRAMANYAM
     S/O SIVANANDAM, NO.155/1,
     ARMSTRONG ROAD,
     BENALURU-560 001

5.   S.M.SUDHEENDRA
     S/O MADHAVA RAO,
     NO.751, PARIJATHA,
     5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 010

6.   SMT.N.SHANKARI
     W/O KUPPUSWAMY,
     B-66, GROUND FLOOR,
     NAL CAMPUS,
     BENGALURU-560 017

7.   M.S.SIVANANDAM
     S/O M.ARMUGAM,
     VINAYAKA POWER PRINTERS,
     NO.85, (OLD NO.40/2)
     ARMSTRONG ROAD,
     BENGALURU-560 001

8.   SMT.SHARADAMMA
     W/O V.DALAPATHI,
                             -3-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC:648-DB
                                       MFA No. 9198 of 2015




     NO.77, GOVINDARAJANAGAR,
     NAGARABHAVI ROAD,
     VIJAYANAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 079

9.   SMT.GUNABHUSHANAM
     W/O LATE GOVINDARAJA PILLAI,
     NO.44, FRUIT STREET,
     SHIVAJINAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 001

                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. B. MARTIN
KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6)

       THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 32(9)
OF STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED13.11.2015 PASSED IN MISC.
NO.699/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIOL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-38), BANGALORE CITY,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 31(1)(aa) & 32 OF SFC
ACT.


       THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS        THROUGH       PHYSICAL        HEARING/VIDEO
CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, DR. H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY,
J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:


                          ORDER

None appear in this matter either physically or

through video conference. No reasons are forthcoming for

NC: 2024:KHC:648-DB

nonappearance of learned counsels in the matter

particularly of learned counsel for the appellant.

2. On 02.01.2024 this Court had made the

following observation:

"None appear in the matter either physically or through Video Conference.

The appeal is of the year 2015 and till date, the appellant has not taken steps to ensure the service of notice upon the unserved respondents and to comply the office objections on I.A.1/2018.

As such, finally two days time is granted to do the needful, failing which, the Court may proceed to pass appropriate orders, including dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance of office objections, as well for non-prosecution.

List the matter on 05.01.2024."

3. In spite of the above, appellant has neither

taken steps to ensure the service of notice as against

unserved respondents including bringing the legal

representatives of alleged deceased respondent No.7 nor

appeared and shown any reason for not doing needful in

NC: 2024:KHC:648-DB

the matter. This clearly goes to show that appellant is not

interested in prosecuting this appeal which is of the year

2015 as such, one of the old appeal pending before this

roster.

Hence, appeal stands dismissed for not taking steps,

as well, for nonprosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

BVK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter