Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1099 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:505
RPFC No. 200042 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 200042 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
MD. ARIF AHEMAD
S/O MD. HAFEEZ MIYAN,
AGED ABOUT: 37 YEARS,
OCC. GOAT MEAT SHOP,
GANDHI GUNJ, R/O H NO. 1-3-77,
CHODE GALLI,
CHOUBARA ROAD,
BIDAR DIST BIDAR-585401.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANTOSH BIRADAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by SACHIN 1. SHAKIRA BEGUM
Location:
HIGH COURT W/O MD. ARIF AHEMAD,
OF
KARNATAKA AGED ABOUT: 31 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEWIFE,
R/O H NO. 1-3-77, CHODE,
GALLI, BIDAR-585401.
2. AKEFF BEGUM TAHESINA
D/O MD. ARIF AHEMAD,
AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS,
(MINOR) U/G OF MOTHER
SHAKIRA BEGUM I.E RES.NO.1
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. HEMA L.K , ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-K:505
RPFC No. 200042 of 2023
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE
FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED 08.03.2022 PASSED BY THE PRL. FAMILY COURT AT
BIDAR IN CRL. MISC.NO.25/2020, AND ALLOW THIS REVISION
PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. This petition filed by the respondent in
Crl.Misc.No.25/2020 challenging the order dated
08.03.2022 passed by the Principal Family Judge
Bidar, granting maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month,
each to the respondents herein.
3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing
for the parties, it is not in dispute that marriage of the
petitioner herein with respondent was solemnized
18.06.2015 and in their wedlock, respondent No.2 is
born. It is also given finding that, the respondents
NC: 2024:KHC-K:505
have left the matrimonial home and the respondents
herein are residing in the parental house of
respondent No.1.
4. Taking into consideration the undisputed
fact that the petitioner herein is running a business of
meat, I am of the opinion that, grant of maintenance
by the Family Court is just and proper and does not
call for interference. Accordingly, the petition is
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!