Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Rajesab S/O Hanif Mulla vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 4565 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4565 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shri Rajesab S/O Hanif Mulla vs The State Of Karnataka on 15 February, 2024

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty

                                             -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590
                                                     CRL.P No. 100332 of 2024




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                     DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                            BEFORE

                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                     CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100332 OF 2024 (439)

             BETWEEN:

                 SHRI RAJESAB S/O. HANIF MULLA,
                 AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. CENTERING WORK,
                 R/O. VINAYAK NAGAR, MARIHAL,
                 TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591103.
                                                                    ...PETITIONER
             (BY SRI S. M. MUCHHANDI, ADVOCATE)
             AND:

                 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                 THE POLICE INSPECTOR MARIHAL
                 POLICE STATION, DIST. BELAGAVI-591103
                 REPRESENTED BY ITS
                 STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally        HIGH COURT BUILDING,
signed by        HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ,
SUJATA           AT. DHARWAD BENCH-580011
SUBHASH                                                            ...RESPONDENT
PAMMAR       (BY SRI T. P. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE)
Date:
2024.02.17          THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C.,
11:37:45
+0530        SEEKING     TO   THAT     THE     PETITION     FILED     BY   THIS
             PETITIONER/ACCUSED      NO.1    MAY     BE   ALLOWED    AND   THIS
             PETITIONER/ACCUSED      NO.1   MAY    BE   ENLARGED    ON BAIL   BY
             IMPOSING REASONABLE CONDITIONS IN MARIHAL P.S. CRIME
             NO.80/2023 U/S 120(B), 302 R/W 34 OF IPC, PENDING TRAIL IN
             S.C. NO.131/2023 ON THE FILE OF XI ADDL.DISTRICT AND
             SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI.
                                -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590
                                       CRL.P No. 100332 of 2024




     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                             ORDER

1. Accused No.1 in S.C.No.131/2023 pending

before the Court of XI Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Belagavi arising out of Crime No.80/2023

registered by Marihal Police Station, Belagavi District for

the offences punishable under Sections 120B and 302 read

with Section 34 of IPC is before this Court under Section

439 of the Cr.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. FIR in Crime No.80/2023 was registered by

Marihal Police Station, District Belagavi against petitioner

and another for the offences punishable under Sections

120B and 302 read with Section 34 of IPC on the basis of

complaint lodged by Sri Santosh Karalingannavar on

19.05.2023. In the said complaint, it is averred that

complainant was informed on 19.05.2023 at about 6.45

a.m. by Basanagouda Irappa Patil who is from his village

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590

that on night of 18.05.2023, petitioner-Rajesab Hanif

Mulla and his friend Akshaykumar Nagappa Konakeri had

assaulted and murdered complainant's brother-Mahantesh

infront of the school in their village. Complainant

immediately went to the spot and after seeing the dead

body of his brother-Mahantesh had approached the Police

and lodged the complaint at about 8.30 a.m. which had

resulted in registering Crime No.80/2023 against the

petitioner and Akshaykumar Nagappa Konakeri.

4. During the course of investigation, the

petitioner was arrested on 19.05.2023. Investigation in

the case is completed and charge sheet is filed. Petitioner

is arrayed as accused No.1 in the charge sheet. Bail

application filed by him before the Court of XI Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi in Criminal

Miscellaneous No.1463/2023 was rejected on 16.12.2023.

Therefore, he is before this Court.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner after

reiterating the grounds urged in the petition submits that

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590

the conduct of CW-10, the alleged eyewitness to the

incident, raises a serious doubt as to whether he had

really witnessed the murder. He submits that earlier there

was an attempt to murder the deceased and in the said

case, the accused persons were acquitted for the offence

punishable under Section 307 of IPC and convicted for the

offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of

IPC. Petitioner has no criminal antecedents. He is aged

about 23 years. Investigation in the case is completed and

charge sheet has been filed. Accordingly, he prays to allow

the petition.

6. Per contra, the learned High Court Government

Pleader has opposed the petition.

7. Complaint was lodged by Sri Santosh

Karalingannavar after he was informed by Sri

Basanagouda Irappa Patil (CW-10) at about 6.45 a.m. on

19.05.2023, that on the night of 18.05.2023 at about 9.30

p.m. accused Nos.1 and 2 had assaulted Mahantesh the

brother of complainant and had committed his murder. As

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590

per the charge sheet allegations, accused Nos.1 and 2 had

conspired to murder Mahantesh, who is brother of

complainant and on 18.05.2023 at about 9.30 p.m. when

Mahantesh was sitting along with CW-10 near the school

in their village, accused Nos.1 and 2 who came there in

the motorbike of accused No.3, had assaulted Mahantesh

with Talavar and had committed his murder. CW-10 who

was with Mahantesh, when accused Nos.1 and 2 assaulted

him, allegedly ran away from the spot and witnessed the

crime from a distance. CW-10 who is alleged to be a close

friend of Mahantesh, thereafter, had gone to the house

and slept. He had neither gone to the Police Station nor

had he gone to the house of complainant to inform about

the incident. It is only on the next day at about 6.45 a.m.,

he had allegedly informed the complainant about the

incident that had taken place on the previous night.

8. The material on record would also go to show

that there was an attempt to murder deceased-Mahantesh

in the year 2016 and the accused in the said case were

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590

tried before the jurisdictional Court in Sessions Case

No.377/2017 and they were acquitted for the offence

punishable under section 307 of IPC and convicted for the

offences punishable under Sections 323, 324 and 341 of

IPC, by the judgment and order dated 05.12.2018.

9. Except the statement of CW-10, there is no

other evidence which connects the petitioner directly to

the crime. The conduct of CW-10 makes the statement of

the said witness prima facie doubtful. Petitioner has no

criminal antecedents and he is in custody from

19.05.2023. He is aged about 23 years. Investigation in

the case is completed. Under the circumstances, I am of

the opinion that the prayer made by the petitioner for

grant of regular bail is required to be answered in the

affirmative. Accordingly the following:

ORDER Petition is allowed. The petitioner/accused No.1 is

directed to be enlarged on bail in S.C.No.131/2023

pending before the Court of XI Additional District and

NC: 2024:KHC-D:3590

Sessions Judge, Belagavi arising out of Crime No.80/2023

registered by Marihal Police Station, Belagavi District for

the offences punishable under Sections 120B and 302 read

with Section 34 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:

i. The petitioner/accused No.1 shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with 2 sureties for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

ii. The petitioner/accused No.1 shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

iii. The petitioner/accused No.1 shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

iv. The petitioner/accused No.1 shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off.

Sd/-

JUDGE CKK CT:GSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter