Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4361 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:6110
RFA No. 192 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 192 OF 2023 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
SRI MANJUNATH
S/O LATE GANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
R/AT NO 35/3 -1 3RD CROSS
13TH MAIN HOSAHALLI
VIJAYANAGARA BANGALORE - 560040
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. V SIDDESH.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT)
AND:
1. SMT SIDDAGANGAMMA
W/O LATE VENKATESH
Digitally signed
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
by HEMALATHA
A
2. SMT GHANAVATHI
Location: High
Court of D/O NARAYANAPPA
Karnataka AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.35/3-1. 3RD CROSS
13TH MAIN HOSAHALLI
VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 040.
3. SRI SRINIVASA
S/O LATE GANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/AT NO MARASANDRA VILLAGE
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:6110
RFA No. 192 of 2023
BENGALURU ROAD
DODDABALLAPURA - 561203.
4. SMT MANJULA
D/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
R/AT NO 31, RAJGOPALANAGAR
PEENYA 2ND STAGE
GANAPATHI TEMPLE ROAD
BEHIND GURU KRUPA
MEDICAL STORE
BENGALURU - 560058.
5. SRINIVAS
S/O LATE MARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/AT NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE
JAYANNA CIRCLE
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560056
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41
RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 18.08.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.2906/2017 ON THE
FILE OF THE 69TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION
AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:6110
RFA No. 192 of 2023
JUDGMENT
When the matter was posted before the Registrar
for non-compliance of office objections for the third time,
none appeared for the appellant and the office objections
were not complied with.
2. The matter was posted for non-compliance of
office objections before the Court on 22.09.2023. On that
day, none appeared for the appellant and the office
objections were not complied with, two weeks time was
granted for compliance of office objections.
3. Even, when the matter was listed on
07.02.2024, none appeared for the appellant in both the
sessions and the office objections were not complied with.
Hence, the matter was ordered to be listed on 08.02.2024,
at the top of the list for 'orders'. Even on 08.02.2024,
none appeared for the appellant in both the sessions and
the office objections were not complied with and the
matter was ordered to be listed to 13.02.2024.
NC: 2024:KHC:6110
4. Even today, none appeared for the appellant in
both the sessions and the office objections are not
complied with. It appears that the appellant is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal.
5. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!