Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3914 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:5395
RFA No. 492 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 492 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. CHIKKA RAMAIAH
S/O LATE SRI RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
2. SRI MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE SRI RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
3. SMT JAYAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS
3(a) SMT RATHNAMMA
W/O LATE JAYARAMAPPA K
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
Digitally signed
3(b) SRI RAMESH
by HEMALATHA S/O LATE JAYARAMAPPA K
A AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
Location: High BOTH ARE R/O WARD NO.18
Court of
Karnataka PUTTAPPA TEMPLE STREET
DEVANAHALLI TOWN.
3(C) SMT SATHYAMMA @ SATHYAVATHI
W/O LATE JAYARAMAPPA K
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
3(D) SMT PADMAMMA J
D/O LATE JAYARAMAPPA K
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:5395
RFA No. 492 of 2018
3(e) SMT LAKSHMIDEVI J
D/O LATE JAYARAMAPPA K
AGEC ABOUT 31 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.20
PUTTAPPA TEMPLE STREET
DEANAHALLI TOWN
BANGALORE DISTRICT-562110.
4. SRI GOPAL
S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT PUTTAPPA TEMPLE STREET
DEVANAHALLI TOWN
BANGALORE DISTRICT-562110.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K VIJAY KUMAR ., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SURESH JAIN
S/O CHANGAL LAL JAIN
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
NO.26, REST HOUSE ROAD
BRIGADE ROAD CROSS
BANGALORE-560001.
2. SONAL JAIN
D/O SHANTHI LAL JAIN
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O NAGAPPA STREET
SHESAHDRIPURAM
BANGALORE-560047.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H R.,ADVOCATE FOR R1:
NOTICE TO R2 IS UNSERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC.,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2018
PASSED IN OS.NO.2231/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:5395
RFA No. 492 of 2018
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo
dated 02.02.2024 stating that the parties have settled the
matter out of the Court.
2. Memo dated 02.02.2024 is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
4. Office is directed to refund the Court fee in favour of
appellant No.2, after due verification.
5. In view of disposal of the main appeal, all pending
applications do not survive and the same are also disposed
of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!