Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt ... vs Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 3734 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3734 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt ... vs Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory ... on 8 February, 2024

Author: M. Nagaprasanna

Bench: M. Nagaprasanna

                           1



Reserved on   : 01.02.2024
Pronounced on : 08.02.2024


       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024    R
                          BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

          WRIT PETITION No.26194 OF 2023 (GM-RES)

BETWEEN:

M/S. OZONE URBANA INFRA
DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.38
ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042
REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/
MR. MAHESH GOWDA C. S.,
                                             ... PETITIONER

(BY SRI. V.SANJAY KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.   THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE
     REGULATORY AUTHORITY
     HAVING OFFICE AT: 2ND FLOOR
     SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK
     UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND
     3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD
     BENGALURU - 560 027
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
                             2



2.   SERENE URBANA APARTMENT OWNERS
     WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.)
     (OZONE URBANA CAMPUS)
     REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA
     SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960
     KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE
     KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK
     BENGALURU RURAL, BENGALURU - 562 110
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
     MR. R.KRISHNASWAMY
     (R/O APT B1-604 SERENE URBANA)

3.   M/S. COVAI PROPERTY CENTRE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,
     A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
     THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
     HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
     COVAI CARE TOWER, 3RD FLOOR
     GEM NIRMAALAYAM, V.G.RAO NAGAR
     GANAPATHY, COIMBATORE - 641 000
     REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4.   M/S. COVAI SENIOR CARE
     CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,
     A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
     THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
     HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
     COVAI CARE TOWER, 3RD FLOOR
     GEM NIRMAALAYAM, V.G.RAO NAGAR
     GANAPATHY, COIMBATORE - 641 000
     REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

5.   M/S. SERENE SENIOR LIVING PVT. LTD.,
     A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
     THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
     485, PANTHEON ROAD, PANTHEON PLACE
     EGMORE, CHENNAI - 600 008
     REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
                                  3



6.   M/S. COLUMBIA PACIFIC
     COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD.,
     A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
     THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
     2999, 12TH MAIN ROAD
     HAL 2ND STAGE, INDRANAGAR
     BENGALURU - 560 008
     REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
                                                       ... RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. GIRISH K. V., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
    SRI. G.SURIYA NARAYANAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY R1 DATED 05/07/2023 REJECTING
THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN
COMPLAINT NO. CMP/UR/211027/0008475/2021 ANNEXURE-A.


     THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR ORDERS ON 01.02.2024, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-


                                 ORDER

The petitioner-M/s Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Private

Limited, is knocking at the doors of this Court calling in question an

order dated 05-07-2023 passed by the Karnataka Real Estate

Regulatory Authority ('the Authority' for short) rejecting an

interlocutory application filed by it in a complaint registered by

respondent No.2. The Authority holds that the complaint is

maintainable before it.

2. Heard Sri V.Sanjay Krishna, learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner, Sri K.V. Girish, learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.1 and Sri G.Suriya Narayanan, learned counsel

appearing for respondent No.2.

3. The facts adumbrated, are as follows:-

The petitioner claims to be a company registered under the

Companies Act, 2013 and is a promoter of several real estate

projects. Likewise the petitioner promotes a project in the name

and style of 'Serene Urbana' exclusively developed for retirement

community over lands bearing Sy.Nos. 126, 127, 16/1 and 153 of

Kannamangala and Poojanahalli Villages, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli

Taluk, Bangalore Rural District. The extent of land on which the

development of retirement community is to be carried out is

averred to be measuring 6.05 acres in blocks I to V consisting of

318 apartments and in block No.6, 32 apartments. It is claimed

that all approvals were taken by the petitioner from the

jurisdictional Planning Authority for a composite development of the

total extent of 6.05 acres.

4. The petitioner, in order to develop and maintain the project

as a retirement community, enters into an agreement with the 4th

respondent who agrees to develop the project on the aforesaid land

after obtaining necessary sanctions and approvals from the

competent authority and to provide all the amenities required to

run and operate the project as a retirement community. The

project was termed to be a group housing apartment project and

proposed to be constructed and sold by the petitioner in favour of

intending purchasers of apartments. The development plan for the

project was obtained from the competent authority on 29-04-2013

to construct the aforesaid residential apartment complex with all

necessary amenities and a revised plan was also submitted on

09-07-2015. The project had to get completed in the month of

April, 2017. It is claimed that when the project was nearing

completion, the petitioner applies for grant of occupancy certificate

before the jurisdictional authority which according to the petitioner

was Kannamangala Gram Panchayat on 27-04-2017. The

occupancy certificate was based upon the completion certificate

issued by the project architect. Based upon the aforesaid

application, the Panchayat resolves to issue occupancy certificate

on 16-05-2017 which ultimately was issued on 16-08-2017.

5. During the aforesaid proceedings, the petitioner had

executed sale deeds in favour of allottees in the project

commencing from June, 2016 for 318 apartments in the project.

Sale deeds in respect of 241 apartments were executed and

registered. Project does not get complete. It is then, the 2nd

respondent Serene Urbana Apartment Owners' Welfare Association

('the Association' for short) knocks at the doors of the Authority by

registering a complaint seeking to declare the project 'Serene

Urbana' as an on-going project and claimed several reliefs inter

alia. The petitioner during the pendency of those proceedings

before the Authority files an application on 09-02-2013 invoking

Sections 35 and 36 of the Real Estate (Regulation and

Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for

short) seeking rejection of the complaint on the ground that the

project is not registerable as it stands excluded under the Rules

framed under the Act particularly with reference to Rule 4.

Therefore, it was the case of the petitioner that it need not register

itself before the Authority. This application is contested to by the

2nd respondent, which results in passing of the impugned order

rejecting the application filed by the petitioner by holding the

complaint to be maintainable and declaring the project of the

petitioner as an 'on-going project'. It is this order that has driven

the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition.

6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,

Sri. V. Sanjay Krishna would take this Court through the provisions

of the Act and the Rules, to contend that under Rule 4 of the Rules

the petitioner is exempted from registering before the Authority as

it was not an on-going project as on the date the Rules came into

force, it was a project where completion certificate was submitted

and occupancy certificate was issued by the competent authority.

He would further contend that entertainment of the complaint by

the Authority was without jurisdiction. If it is without jurisdiction,

any order that is passed is a nullity in law. He would seek to place

reliance on the judgment of this Court in M/s PROVIDENT

HOUSING LIMITED v. KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE

REGULATORY AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER1, to buttress his

submission. It is his submission that the judgment in the aforesaid

writ petition covers the issue on all its fours.

7. Per contra, the learned counsel representing the 2nd

respondent/Association would vehemently refute the submissions.

It is his contention that the petition suffers from suppression of

material facts. It is the case of the petitioner that it has secured an

occupancy certificate after submitting completion certificate.

Neither the completion certificate nor occupancy certificate is placed

on record by the petitioner. It is his submission that he has placed

all the documents on record which would clearly demonstrate the

fraud played by the petitioner in getting away from the rigours of

Act. It is an on-going project even to-day as the project is not

complete and the occupancy certificate is secured on bogus

documents. He would submit that the project is meant for senior

citizens, projected as retirement home, and these old people are

ILR 2023 KAR 777

made to suffer due to the acts of the petitioner. He would seek

dismissal of the petition.

8. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions

made by the respective learned counsel and have perused the

material on record.

9. The afore-narrated facts are not in dispute. For a complete

resolution, a few dates would require reiteration. The project that is

sought to be developed is not in dispute. It was to be a retirement

home projected for retirement community/senior citizens to ensure

harmonious living in the community is a matter of record. It is this

projection that lured the retired home buyers. The development

plan for the project was sanctioned by the Planning Authority on

29-04-2013, to construct a residential apartment complex with

basic amenities for old age people. The plan was later modified on

09-07-2015. It is then the sale deeds are executed for 241

apartments in an apartment complex of 318 apartments. It is

claimed that after the sale deeds are executed, the petitioner

approaches the competent authority - the Kannamangala Gram

Panchayat with a completion certificate and secures an occupancy

certificate dated 16-05-2017 and on 16-08-2017.

10. To consider the issue projected, it becomes germane to

notice certain provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and

Development) Act, 2016 ('Act' for short) and the Karnataka Real

Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 ('Rules' for

short).

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016:

Section 2 of the Act deals with definitions. Section 2(m), (n),

(q), (t), (zb) and (zf) of the Act run as follows:

"2(m) "Commencement certificate" means the commencement certificate or the building permit or the construction permit, by whatever name called issued by the competent authority to allow or permit the promoter to begin development works on an immovable property, as per the sanctioned plan;

(n) "common areas" mean--

(i) the entire land for the real estate project or where the project is developed in phases and registration under this Act is sought for a phase, the entire land for that phase;

(ii) the staircases, lifts, staircase and lift lobbies, fire escapes, and common entrances and exits of buildings;

(iii) the common basements, terraces, parks, play areas, open parking areas and common storage spaces;

(iv) the premises for the lodging of persons employed for the management of the property including accommodation for watch and ward staffs or for the lodging of community service personnel;

(v) installations of central services such as electricity, gas, water and sanitation, air-

conditioning and incinerating, system for water conservation and renewable energy;

(vi) the water tanks, sumps, motors, fans, compressors, ducts and all apparatus connected with installations for common use;

(vii) all community and commercial facilities as provided in the real estate project;

(viii) all other portion of the project necessary or convenient for its maintenance, safety, etc., and in common use;

                            ....      ....      ....

(q)     "Completion certificate"      means the      completion

certificate, or such other certificate, by whatever name called, issued by the competent authority certifying that the real estate project has been developed according to the sanctioned plan, layout plan and specifications, as approved by the competent authority under the local laws;

.... .... ....

(t) "development works" means the external development works and internal development works on immovable property;

.... .... ....

(zb) "Internal development works" means roads, footpaths, water supply, sewers, drains, parks, tree planting, street lighting, provision for community buildings and for treatment and disposal of sewage and sullage water, solid waste management and disposal, water conservation, energy management, fire protection and fire safety requirements, social infrastructure such as education health and other public amenities or any other work in a project for its benefit, as per sanctioned plans;

                                  ....   ....        ....

     (zf)     "Occupancy certificate" means the occupancy

certificate, or such other certificate, by whatever name called, issued by the competent authority permitting occupation of any building, as provided under local laws, which has provision for civic infrastructure such as water, sanitation and electricity;"

(Emphasis supplied)

Section 2(m) defines what is a Commencement certificate. It

is the one that permits construction of a building or to begin

development works on an immovable property as per the

sanctioned plan.

Section 2(n) defines Common areas.

Section 2(q) defines what is a Completion certificate. The

Completion certificate would mean the one issued by the competent

authority certifying that the real estate project has been developed

according to the sanctioned plan, layout plan and specifications, as

approved by the competent authority.

Section 2(t) defines Development works, to mean external

development works and internal development works on the said

property.

Section (zb) defines internal development works. They are

manifold.

Section (zf) defines Occupancy certificate. Occupancy

certificate would mean, a certificate issued by the competent

authority permitting occupation of any building, as provided under

locals laws which would necessarily contain civic infrastructure such

as water, sanitation and electricity.

Two of the provisions quoted supra forms the fulcrum of the

present lis. One being, the completion certificate. The completion

certificate, as observed, mandates that the real estate project has

been developed according to the sanctioned plan, layout plan and

specifications. Occupancy certificate mandates that a building

should be complete with infrastructure such as water, sanitation

and electricity.

The Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017:

11. The Government of Karnataka in exercise of powers

conferred under Section 84 of the Act promulgates the Rules. The

Rules come into effect on 10-07-2017. Rules 3 and 4 are germane

to be noticed and they read as follows:

"3. Information and documents to be furnished by the promoter for registration of project.-- (1) The promoter shall furnish the following additional information and documents, along with those specified in sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Act for registration of the real estate project with the regulatory authority namely:--

(a) self attested copy of the PAN card of the promoter;

(b) annual report including audited profit and loss account, balance sheet, cash flow statement, directors report and the auditors report of the promoter for the immediately preceding three financial years; and where annual report is not available, the audited profit and loss account, balance sheet, cash flow statement and the auditor report of the promoter for the immediately preceding three financial years;

(c) the number of parking slots available in the said real estate project;

(d) authenticated copy of the legal title deed reflecting the title of the promoter to the land on which development of project is proposed along with legally valid documents for chain of the title;

(e) the details of encumbrances on the land for which permission given under Section 109 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 if applicable, the Certified copy of the conversion order under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and permission of change in land use granted under Section 14 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, if applicable on which development is proposed including any rights, title, interest or name of any party in or over such land along with details;

(f) where the promoter is not the owner of the land on which development is proposed details of the consent of the owner of the land along with self attested the collaboration agreement, development agreement, joint development agreement or any other agreement, as the case may be, entered into between the promoter and such owner and copies of title and other documents reflecting the title of such owner on the land proposed to be developed; and

(g) name, photograph, contact details and address of the promoter if it is an individual and the name, photograph, contact details and address of the chairman, partners, directors, as the case may be, and the authorised person in case of other entities.

(2) An application to the Authority for registration of the real estate project shall be made in writing in Form 'A', in triplicate, until the procedure is made web based for filing of such application.

(3) The promoter shall pay a registration fee at the time of application for registration by way of a demand draft or a bankers cheque drawn on any scheduled bank or a Co-

operative Bank or through online payment mode, as the case may be, for a sum calculated at the rate of,--

(a) in case of group housing project,-five rupees per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed one thousand square meters; or rupees ten per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed

exceeds one thousand square meters, but shall not be more than five lakhs rupees;

(b) in case of mixed development (residential and commercial) project,-ten rupees per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed one thousand square meters; or fifteen rupees per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed exceeds one thousand square meters, but shall not be more than seven lakhs rupees;

(c) in case of commercial projects,-twenty rupees per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed one thousand square meters; or twenty five rupees per square meter for projects where the area of land proposed to be developed exceeds one thousand square meters, but shall not be more than ten lakhs rupees; and

(d) in case of plotted development projects,-five rupees per square meter, but shall not be more than two lakhs rupees.

(4) The declaration to be submitted under clause (l) of sub-section (2) of Section 4, shall be in Form-B, which shall include a declaration stating that the promoter shall not discriminate against any allottee at the time of allotment of any apartment, plot or a building, as the case may be.

(5) In case the promoter applies for withdrawal of application for registration of the project before the expiry of the period of thirty days specified under sub-section (1) of Section 5, registration fee to the extent of ten percent paid under sub-rule (3), or rupees fifty thousand whichever is more, shall be retained as processing fee by the regulatory authority and the remaining amount shall be refunded to the promoter within thirty days from the date of such withdrawal.

4. Additional disclosure by promoters of ongoing projects.-- (1) Upon the notification for commencement of sub-section (1) of Section 3, promoters of all ongoing projects which have not received completion certificate

shall, within the time specified in the said sub-section, make an application to the Regulatory Authority in the form and manner as specified in Rule 3.

Explanation: For the purpose of this rule "Ongoing project" means a project where development is going on and for which completion certificate has not been issued but excludes such projects which fulfill any of the following criteria on the date of notification of these rules, namely:--

(i) in respect of layouts where the streets and civic amenities sites and other services have been handed over to the Local Authority and Planning Authority for maintenance;

(ii)

(ii) in respect of apartments where common areas and facilities have been handed over to the registered Association consisting of majority of allottees;

(iii) where all development works have been completed as per the Act and certified by the competent agency and sale/lease deeds of sixty percent of the apartments/houses/ plots have been registered and executed;

(iv) where all development works have been completed as per the Act and certified by the competent agency and application has been filed with the competent authority for issue of completion certificate/occupation certificate; and

(v) where Partial occupancy certificate is obtained to the extent of the portion for which the partial occupancy certificate is obtained.

(2) The promoter shall in addition to disclosures provided in Rule 3 disclose the following information, namely:--

(a) the original sanctioned plan, layout plan and specifications and the subsequent modifications carried out, if any, including the existing sanctioned plan, layout plan and specifications;

Explanation:--For the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of Section 14 of the Act, the Prior written consent of at least two third of the allottees would not be required if,--

(i) implementation of the proposed plan has already been disclosed to the allottees under the agreement prior to registration, or

(ii) modification is required to be made in compliance of any order or direction issued by competent authority or statutory authority, under the agreement for sale, the promoter is not required to obtain the consent of allottee in case of any alteration or addition to the apartment required by Government authorities or due to change in any law.

(b) the total amount of money collected from the allottees and the total amount of money used for development of the project including the total amount of balance money lying with the promoter; and

(c) status of the project (extent of development carried out till date and the extent of development pending) including the original time period disclosed to the allottee for completion of the project at the time of sale including the delay and the time period within which he undertakes to complete the pending project, which shall be commensurate with the extent of development already completed, and this information shall be certified by an engineer, an architect and a chartered accountant in practice.

(3) The promoter shall disclose the size of the apartment based on carpet area even if earlier sold on

any other basis such as super area, super built up area, built up area etc. which shall not affect the validity of the agreement entered into between the promoter and the allottee to that extent.

(4) In case of plotted development, the promoter shall disclose the area of the plot being sold to the allottees as per the layout plan.

(5) For projects that are ongoing and have not received completion certificate on the date of commencement of the Act, the promoter shall, within a period of three months of the application for registration of the project with the Authority, deposit in the separate bank account, seventy per cent, of the amounts already realized from the allottees, which have not been utilized for construction of the project or the land cost for the project as required under sub-clause (D) of clause (l) of sub-section (2) of Section 4, which shall be used for the purposes specified therein:

Provided that if the receivable of the ongoing project is less than the estimated cost of balance construction, then the promoter shall deposit 100 per cent of the amounts to be realised in the separate account."

(Emphasis supplied)

Rule 3 mandates information and documents to be furnished by the

promoter for registration of a project under the Act. Rule 4

mandates additional disclosure by promoters of ongoing projects.

The said Rule mandates that upon the notification for

commencement under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act,

promoters of all ongoing projects which have not received

completion certificate shall, within the time specified in the said

sub-section, make an application to the Regulatory Authority. The

rule places an explanation as to what is an ongoing project. An

ongoing project would mean where a development of a project is

going on for which completion certificate has not been issued but

excluded those projects which fulfill the criteria enumerated therein

which are lay-outs where the streets and civic amenities and other

services have been handed over to the Local Authority. It is in the

aforesaid statutory frame work, the issue in the lis is to be

considered.

12. The dates are undisputed. After execution of sale deeds

as aforeaid, the petitioner approaches the competent authority -

Kannamangala Gram Panchayat to secure occupancy certificate, for

which submission of completion certificate is imperative. The

certificate that was placed before the Gram Panchayat requires to

be noticed. It reads as follows:

"ನಮೂ ೆ - V ಖಂಡ (12 ೇ ಖಂ ಡ ೋ ) ಪ ಣ ೊಂಡ ಬ ೆ ಪ ಾಣ ಪvÀæ

ಾನು ________ ಾ ಮದ ________ ೕ ಯ ೕ/ ೕಮ ________ ಇವ# ೆ $ೇ#ದ ________ ಸಂ&ೆ'ಯ ()ೇಶನದ ನ ಕಟ-ಡವನು. /ೕ 01ಾರ3ೆ ಾಡ4ಾ5, ಕಟ-ಡವ6 ಅ8ವೃ : ಹಂತದ =ೆ / ( ಾ ಣ ೊಂ =ೆ / ಮರು ( ಾ ಣ ೊಂ =ೆ ಅಥ)ಾ ಾ?ಾ ಟು ಾಡ4ಾ5=ೆ ಎಂದು ಮತುA _______ ಸಂ&ೆ'ಯ ________

ಾಂಕದಂದು ಮಂಜೂCಾದ ನDೆಯನು. ೋಡ4ಾ5 ಅದEೆF ಅನು$ಾರ)ಾ5 ಕಟ-ಡವ6 ________ ರಂದು ಪ ಣ ೊಂ ರುವ6ದನು. ಾನು ಈ ಮೂಲಕ ಪ ಾIೕಕ#ಸುJೆAೕ ೆ. Eಾಮ ಾ#ಯು ನನ. ಪ Eಾರ ತೃKAಕರ)ಾ5 ಪ ಣ ೊಂ =ೆ. Eಾಯ Eೌಶಲ' ಮತುA $ಾ ಾನ' ಮತುA ( ಷ- ಪ Nದ OವರಗQ ೆ ಅನು$ಾರ)ಾ5 ಎಲ ಸರಕು $ಾಮ5 ಗಳನು. (ಬ ೆ ಮತುA ದSೆ ) (ಖರ)ಾ5Tೕ ಬಳEೆ ಾಡ4ಾ5=ೆ.

________ ಾಂಕ ________ ನಮೂ ೆಯ ಒಪVಂದದ ೊತುAಪ Nದ ಎಲ ಷರತುAಗಳನು. ?ಾ ಸ4ಾ5=ೆ.

ಈ ಕಟ-ಡವನು. Wಾವ ಉ=ೆYೕಶEಾF5 (Z ಸ4ಾ5=ೆ / ಪ6ನ[ (Z ಸ4ಾ5=ೆ / ಾ?ಾ ಟು ೊQಸ4ಾ5=ೆ, \ೆ]^ ೆ ಕಟು-ವ ಮೂಲಕ OಸA#ಸ4ಾ5=ೆ_ೕ ಆ ಉ=ೆYೕಶEೆF ಬಳಸಲು ಸೂಕA)ಾ5=ೆ"

¸À»/- ªÀiÁ°ÃPÀ£À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸À» (PÀbÉÃjAiÀÄ ªÉƺÀj£ÉÆA¢UÉ ªÉÄðéZÁgÀPÀ£À ¸À» ¢£ÁAPÀ: 13.04.2017."

(Emphasis added)

The completion certificate is submitted by the project architect.

Completion certificate under the Act would mean that the real

estate project has been developed according to the sanctioned

layout, layout plan and specifications as approved by the competent

authority. None of those indications are found in the completion

certificate placed before the Panchayath. It is dated 13-04-2017.

All the information necessary to be filled in, remain blank. The

owner's name and his signature is blank. But, the Gram Panchayat

accepts it and affixes the signature. It is rather shocking as to how

the Gram Panchayat could affix the signature, of receipt of

completion certificate, which is completely blank. The certificate

reads that it is '¥ÀÆtðUÉÆAqÀ §UÉÎ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt¥ÀvÀæ'. Therefore, the petitioner is

projecting the apartment complex as complete. Neither the

apartment complex was complete, nor a complete completion

certificate, was placed before the Gram Panchayat. The request of

the petitioner for issue of occupancy certificate reads as follows:

"To: Date:27.04.2017 THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, Kannamangala Village Panchayat, Kannamangala Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District.

Dear Sir,

Sub: Requesting to issue occupancy certificate for Serene Residential apartment on Sy.No.126, 127, 153 of Kannamangala Village and Sy.No.16/1 of Poojenahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, for 360 units measuring 42337.78 sq.mtrs.

Ref: BIAAPA approved Building plan vide Commencement Certificate по. BIAAPA/TP1/CC/33/2015-16/4798 dated 11.03.2016.

This is with reference to the above subject, we request you to issue occupancy certificate for Serene Residential apartment on Sy.No.126, 127, 153 of Kannamangala Village and Sy.No.16/1 of Poojenahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, for 360 units measuring 42337.78 sq.mtrs.,

Please find we are herewith enclosed following documents:

1. Sale deed register Doc. No.367/16-17 dated 31.03.2016 for Sy.No.126, 127.

2. Sale Deed register Doc. No.9501/06-07 dated 16.03.2007 for Sy.No.153, 16/1.

3.Conversion order vide no. ALN(D)SR/105/2012- 13 dated 19.12.2012

4. Panchayath Khata no.6

5. Tax paid receipt

6. BIAAPA approved Modified Development Plan dated 09.07.2015

7.BIAAPA approved Building plan vide Commencement Certificate no.BIAAPA/ TP1/CC/33/2015-16/4798 dated 11.03.2016.

Kindly acknowledge the receipt of the same and issue partly occupancy certificate at the earliest

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully, for M/s. Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd."

(Emphasis added)

The afore-quoted is the representation submitted for securing an

occupancy certificate. The documents that are appended to the

representation would clearly indicate that it is akin to seeking a

commencement certificate, not the occupancy certificate, as the

occupancy certificate to be issued under the Section 2(zf) of the Act

supra would require complete infrastructure such as water,

sanitation and electricity to be in place. Neither the completion

certificate nor the representation seeking occupancy certificate even

whispers about water, sanitation or electricity in place. But on the

basis of the aforesaid representation, the Gram Panchayat issues an

occupancy certificate. The occupancy certificate reads as follows:

"PÀ£ÀߪÀÄAUÀ® UÁæªÀÄ ¥ÀAZÁ¬ÄÛ PÁAiÀiÁð®AiÀÄ

PÀ£ÀߪÀÄAUÀ®, zÉêÀ£ÀºÀ½î vÁ®ÆèPÀÄ, ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ f¯Éè.

ಸಂ&ೆ': ಕ. ಾ .ಪಂ 76/2017-18

ರವ# ೆ, /.ಓSೋb ಅಬ ಾ ಇ ಾc dೆ)ೆಲಪgïì ?ೆe.

ನಂ.38, ಅಲಸೂರು ರ$ೆA fೆಂಗಳgರು.

ಾನ'Cೇ,

Oಷಯ:- $ಾ0 ೕನ ಪ ಾಣ ಪತ ವನು. (ೕಡು Aರುವ ಬ ೆ, :-:16/05/2017 ಉ4ೇಖ: :16/05/2017gÀ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£Àå ¸À¨ÉsAiÀÄ ನಡವQಗಳi.

************

/ೕಲFಂಡ Oಷಯ ಮತುA ಉ4ೇಖನEೆF ಸಂಬಂ NದಂJೆ ತಮ ೆ Qಯಪ ಸುವ6=ೇ ೆಂದCೆ, ಾಂಖ:16/05/2017 ರ $ಾ ಾನ' ಸkೆಯ ಕ ಸಂ:6/4 ರ (ಣ ಯದ ಓSೋb ಅ¨Áðನವರು ಪ ಣ , ಕಟ-ಡ ಪರ)ಾ( ೆ Jೆ# ೆ, 4ೇಬ[ $ೆm ಕn-ದ ನಂತರ ಒ.N ( ಅಕು'?ೆ(o ಪ ಾಣ ಪತ ) (ೕಡಲು ೕ ಾ (ಸ4ಾ5ರುತA=ೆ.

ಾಂಕ:16/08/2017 ರಂದು ಾ ಮ ಪಂ1ಾಯ ೆ ಅEಾ0 ವಸ ಅ?ಾp /ಂಟು ಕಟ-ಡ-1 ಮತುA $ೆCೆ ಾ ವಸ ಅ?ಾp /ಂಟು ಕಟ-ಡಗQ ೆ ಸಂಬಂ NದಂJೆ 4ೇಬ[ $ೆm ?ಾವ Nದ ರ ೕ ಗಳನು. (ೕ ದುY, ಓSೋb ಆ¨Áðನ ೆ ಸಂಬಂ NದಂJೆ $ೆCೆ ಾ ವಸ ಅ?ಾp /ಂಟನು. ಕನ.ಮಂಗಲ ಾ ಮದ ಸ)ೆ ನಂಬ[ 126, 127, 153 ಮತುA ಪ ಜನಹQq ಾ ಮದ ಸ)ೆ ನಂಬ[:16/1 ರ Sಾಗದ 42337.78 (ನಲವJೆAರಡು $ಾOರದ ಮುನೂ.ರ ಮೂವJೆAೕಳi) ಚ.Zೕಟರುಗಳ Sಾಗದ ಕn-ದುY ಮತುA ಕನ.ಮಂಗಲ ಾ ಮದ ಸ)ೆ ನಂಬ[ 89/1,92/2,105 ರ Sಾಗದ 37276.68 (ಮೂವJೆAೕಳi $ಾOರದ ಇನೂ.ರ ಎಪVJಾAರು) ಚ.Zೕಟರುಗಳ Sಾಗದ ಅEಾ0 ವಸ ಅ?ಾp /ಂnನ ಕಟ-ಡ-1 ಅನು. ( ಎ, , N, , ಇ)

ಕಟ-ಡ ಕn-ದುY, ಕಟ-ಡ ( ಾ ಣ (ಯಮಗಳನು. ಉಲಂsN ಕn-ದY#ಂದ ಕ ಾ ಟಕ Cಾಜ' ಪತ ದ ಸಂ&ೆ'. ಾ .ಅಪ788 ಾ ಪಂಅ2014, fೆಂಗಳgರು, :08/05/2015 ರಂJೆ, ದಂಡ, ಕಟ-ಡ ಪರ)ಾ( ೆ ಶುಲF, &ಾ ()ೇಶನದ ಶುಲF $ೇ# ಒಟು- 6071631=00 ರೂ?ಾtಗಳನು. ರ ೕu ಸಂ&ೆ': 629994, 629992, 629993, 649203, 649201, 649202, 649204 ರಂJೆ ?ಾವ Nರು Aೕ#. \ಾಗೂ ಕ ಾ ಟಕ Cಾಜ' ಪತ ದ ಸಂ&ೆ' ಾ ಅಪ788 ಾ ಪಂಅ2014, fೆಂಗಳgರು, :08/05/2015 ರಂJೆ ಕಟ-ಡ ನDೆಯನು. ತWಾ#Nದ ಅuಕೃತ ಇಂಜ(ಯ[ ರವ#ಂದ ಕಟ-ಡ ಪ ಣ ೊಂಡ ಪ ಾಣ ಪತ ಮತುA ಪ# ೕಲ ಾ ಪ ಾಣ ಪತ ಸ NದುY ಬಯ?ಾ ಅನುvೕ ತ ನDೆಯಂJೆ ಕಟ-ಡ (Z Nರುವ6=ಾ5 ಇಂಜ(ಯ[ರವರು ದೃ ೕಕ#NರುJಾACೆ.

(ಯ ಾನು$ಾರ ಬಯ?ಾ (ಯಮಗQ ೊಳಪಟು- ಾ ಮ ಪಂ1ಾಯ ಯ ಪ )ಾ ನುಮ ಇಲ=ೆ ಕಟ-ಡವನು. Wಾವ6=ೇ ಾ?ಾ ಟು ಾಡುವ6ದನು. (wೇuNದುY, $ಾ0uೕನ ಪ ಾಣ ಪತ ವನು. ಪdೆದ ನಂತರ ಾ ೕಕರು ಕೂಡ4ೇ ತಮx \ೆಸ# ೆ ಎ4ಾ ಘಟಕಗಳ &ಾJೆಗಳನು. ಕಟ-ಡ Jೆ# ೆ ?ಾವ N ೋಂ=ಾtN EೊಳqತಕF=ೆYಂದು ಷರತುA OuNರುJೆA.

ಕನ.ಮಂಗಲ ಾ ಮದ ಸ)ೆ ನಂಬ[ 126, 127, 153 ಮತುA ಪ ಜನಹQq ಾ ಮದ ಸ)ೆ ನಂಬ[:16/1 ರ 42337.78 (ನಲವJೆAರಡು $ಾOರದ ಮುನೂ.ರ ಮೂವJೆAೕಳi) ಚ.Zೕಟರುಗಳ Sಾಗದ $ೆCೆ ಾ ವಸ ಅ?ಾp /ಂp ಕಟ-ಡEೆF ಉ4ೇzತ $ಾ ಾನ' ಸkೆಯ ೕ ಾ ನದಂJೆ ಷರತುAಗQ ೆ ಒಳಪಟು- $ಾ0uೕನ ಪ ಾಣ (ೕ ರುJೆA.

ತಮx Owಾ0N

ಸ{/-

ಪಂ1ಾt ಅ8ªÀÈ¢Þ ಕನ.ಮಂಗಲ ಾ ನು ಪಂ1ಾt =ೇವನಹQq Jಾಲೂರು."

(Emphasis added)

A perusal at the occupancy certificate would indicate that the

Authorities have not even looked into the statute. There is no

indication about the works completed qua sanitation, electricity and

water. The apartment complex was not complete at all, when the

completion certificate was submitted and occupancy certificate was

granted. The occupancy certificate is resorted to be granted without

even inspecting the property, by the Kannamangala Gram

Panchayat. Therefore, the occupancy certificate granted runs

blatantly contrary to law.

13. On the project being dragged without rhyme and reason,

the Association of retired people i.e., the retired home buyers/senior

citizens knock at the doors of the Authority. The Authority issues

notice and directs a spot inspection to be conducted of the project to

get to know as to whether the project is actually complete as on

10-07-2017 or the completion certificate was a bogus document

submitted for getting an occupancy certificate. The report of the

said inspection is produced by the 2nd respondent. It reads as

follows;

"SPOT INSPECTION REPORT: SERENE URBANA Date of inspection: 29.06.2022

Site inspection report of Residential Project "SERENE urbana" ozone urbana campus, Kannamangala village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli taluk, Bengaluru Rural.

SL       Descriptions                   Details
NO
1       Project Name             "SERENE URBANA
2       Promoter Name            M/S     OZONE      URBANA    INFRA
                                 DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
3       Project Address          Ozone          Urbana     campus,
                                 Kannnamangala village,      Kasaba




                              Hobli, Devanahalli taluk, Bangalore
                              Rural.
4   Project Type              Residential Development/ Group
                              housing.
5    Registration Number      Un-registered Number
6   Complaint number          CMP/8475
7   Plan Approved by           BIAPPA           vide         no.
                               TP09/CC/33/2015-16         dated
                               11.03.2016              Bangalore
                               International     Airport   Area
                               Planning Authority.


    Ref:Note             from Hon'ble Chairman vide letter   No:

gÉÃgÁ/PÀ/CzsÀåPÀëgÀÄ/C±Á/n10/2021-22 dated 10/06/2022.

As per the directions of the Hon'ble Chairman, the above group housing project "SERENE URBANA was inspected by Engineering Inspection Team (RERA), on 29.06.2022. The complainants and the office bearers of the serene Urbana owners welfare association were present along with their advocate. But the developer or Representatives of the Developer were absent, inspite of prior intimation through e-mail (attendance sheet enclosed).

The above group housing project SERENE URBANA consists of 360 numbers of flats approved by BIAAPA in its development plan vide no.BIAAPA/TP3/DP/03/2012-13 dated 9.07.2015 and sanctioned plan vide no.BIAAPA /TP/09/CC/33/2015-16 dated 11.03.2016. This project is not registered under K RERA. There are 3- buildings in this project, Building 01-256 units, Building 02- 72 units & Building 3-32 units, total-360 housing units including "URBANA IRENE, URBANA SERENE" in stilt +Ground+7 upper floors.

The following points were raised by the members of the association "SERENE URBANA" apartment owners association (SUAOWA) registered under Karnataka society's registration act bearing Reg no.DBR/SOR/36/201819.

1. This housing project is maintained by an external agency appointed by the developer without the consent of SUAOWA.

2. The project work is completed and the occupancy certificate is issued by PDO, Kannamangala village panchayat dated 16.08.2017.

3. Fire clearance for building-3 was obtained on 21.05.2019, which is after the Occupancy certificate issued by Grama Panchayat dated on 16.08.2017.

4. BESCOM Permanent power supply is obtained by the developer on 21.08.2018.

5. As per association and as per the Brochure submitted, the organic converter plant has to be installed as per the requirement of PCB, Air conditioning of dining hall not done, shaded walkway, Wellness centre, UPS Backup for each housing unit not provided.

6. Amenities promised such as health club, steam room, sauna room, Jacuzzi, Pharmacy, indoor badminton court, crèche and ATM facilities are not provided.

7. Sewage treatment plant located in Serene Urbana campus is connected to other blocks also.

8. The Exit road to the south as per sanctioned plan is blocked as of now and the entry is restricted.

9. Lift clearance for this project from the electrical inspectorate is obtained 14.01.2019 and for DG installation clearance on 4.01.2019.

10. Water supply is done using only one bore well, which is connected to water treatment plant and it is in operation.

The project was inspected and found that the allottees are already staying and facilities provided are in use, there was nobody from the developer side to clarify regarding the complaints.

This is for your kind information."

(Emphasis added)

The inspection is conducted on 29-06-2022, five years after

issuance of occupancy certificate on the completion certificate

submitted by the petitioner. The lacunae are fire clearance for the

building was obtained on 21-05-2019 without which occupancy

certificate could not have been granted. But, the Gram Panchayat

grants it on 16-08-2017 two years before fire clearance. BESCOM

power supply is obtained on 21-08-2018. The Gram Panchayat

grants occupancy certificate to an apartment complex which did not

have even the power. None of the amenities that were assured and

promised to lure the retired home buyers were in place. Sewage

treatment plant was yet to come up. Lifts were not provided as DG

installation clearances for the lift was issued on 04-01-2019. Water

supply was not complete. All these lacunae are found on the date of

inspection i.e., 29-06-2022, to be present, as on the date of

issuance of occupancy certificate.

14. Every trait that is necessary for grant of an occupancy

certificate, is secured by the petitioner long after issuance of

occupancy certificate. Therefore, it becomes surprising, as to how

the Gram Panchayat granted occupancy certificate without even

looking into the apartment complex. This is shrouded in mystery.

Since the project was not handed over, as observed hereinabove,

the 2nd respondent knocks at the doors of the Authority. The

Authority rejects the application filed by the petitioner that it was

not an on-going project, but stood completed and directs the

petitioner to register itself under RERA. The order passed by the

Authority reads as follows:

"ORDER

(a) The Interlocutory Application dated 9-02-2023 filed by the respondent No.1 promoter is hereby rejected.

(b) This complaint is maintainable.

(c) The "Serene Urbana Project" is declared as an "on-going project". The respondent No.1 promoter, M/s Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt.Ltd., respondent No.3, M/s Covai Senior Care Constructions Pvt. Ltd., and respondent No.4 M/s Serene Senior Living Pvt.Ltd. are hereby directed to register the "Serene Urbana Project" under RERA immediately as per Section 3 of the Real

Estate (Regulation and Development) Act within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order."

(Emphasis added)

The Authority directs registration of the petitioner before it within 2

weeks from the date of the order. If regard is had to what is

observed hereinabove, it cannot be said that 'Serene Urbana' a

retirement home was a project that was complete on the strength of

completion certificate which does not inspire even a semblance of

confidence. Therefore, no fault can be found with the order passed

by the Authority directing registration of the project as an 'on-going

project'. There cannot be a cavil of doubt that the project was, as

on 10-07-2017, the date on which the Rules came into force was

still an 'on-going project' as neither the completion certificate nor

the occupancy certificate were issued in accordance with law, the

project was yet to get completed, on the date on which the

occupancy certificate was issued. The judgment in the case of M/S.

PROVIDENT HOUSING (supra) is distinguishable on the facts

obtaining in the case at hand, without much ado. The facts are

entirely different, the project was complete in the said case, while it

is not in the case at hand.

15. The respondents, in order to vindicate their stand that it

was an ongoing project, has placed several communications in the

form of assurances by the petitioner to the home buyers. It is

germane to notice what are the assurances meted out to the

petitioner home buyers/retirement home buyers. As an illustration

three of the assurances meted out are quoted for the purpose of

quick reference and they read as under:

"Mr. Ramswamy Ramachandran 3A, Ascot Apartments, 191 4th Cross, Defence Colony, 6th Main Indira Nagar, Bangalore - 560038 (M): 9902040973

Sub: Allotment of (a Retirement Apartment Unit in Project Urbana Irene.

Dear Sir,

We thank you for investing in Residential Unit No.304, 3 BHK in Block C in Urbana Irene Retirement Community, NH- 7, Kannamangala Village, Kasaba Hobl, Devanahalli Taluk- 562 110. On the basis of the information provided by you and also on the assurances regarding prompt payments of various installments payable by you as per the schedule payments indicated to you at the time of booking and with the understanding that you will enter into suitable documentation as provided or advised by us, we hereby allot you the Unit No.304 mentioned below:

The details of the Retirement Residential Unit allotted to you are as follows:

      Block                              :       Block C
      Unit Type                          :       3 BHK
      Floor                              :       3
      Saleable Area                      :       1461 Sq ft
      Car Park                           :       1
      Basic Cost                         :       Rs. 68,52,090/-

Note: *Basic cost mentioned above indicates only Land & Construction Cost. All statutory taxes and levies, Senior Care Specifications, Deposits etc will be additional and as per the terms of the cost sheet agreed and signed by you.

Please note that this allotment letter by itself does not create any independent right, possessory or otherwise in the above residential unit execution.


10   On Completion       320,204        24,415      344,619
     of       External
     Plastering

11   Balance       on 281,974           26,602      308,576
     Possession
     Total               5,006,571      438,027     5,444,598


      •     Computed     based    on the   present prevailing

taxes/statute, any prospective changes shall be applicable and binding.

ANNEXURE-III Delivery Schedule

The delivery of the Residential Unit will be handed over by 31st March 2018 with a grace period of an additional Six (06) months.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their respective hands the day, month and year first herein above written."

-o-

"Re: Urbana Irene - C Block - Handing Over:

On  Wed,    26    Dec  2018            at   10:11,     Megha
<[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Sir/Ma'am,

Vanakkam.

We are happy to inform you that C Block of Urbana Irene is ready for possession. The work on Senior Care Centre to provide services and care is in full swing.

We request you to take over your apartment so that the interior work can commence. Many have since got it done. Please give us 72 hour notice before you visit the site. Kindly complete this process by 15th Jan 2019 unless due to compelling reasons that you are unable to visit. In that case, please tell us your probable date of visit.

We are also in the process of finalising the sale deed for registration. The registration will commence after 15th Jan 2019. The Senior Care Centre will be operational by 31st Jan'19. Lifts will not be functional before Mar 2019, however we can provide services by end Jan 2019 for residents in C Block. Please plan your move accordingly.

We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Kind regards, Unnimegha K B Manager CRM Customer Relations"

"Dear Sir/Madam,

Greetings from Serene.

We are pleased to announce that your apartment is ready for handover for interiors/wood work starting 10th August 2017. You may collect the keys from the

site from Ozone representative Ms. Nalina / Mr. Saravana Kumar (Contact No.: +91 99800 33658).

Do let us know your convenient date for taking the handover so we can make necessary arrangements at the site and assist you with a guided tour of your apartment.

At the time of handover you may observe some snags in your apartment, we request you to bring the same to the attention of the site engineer and Serene representative Mr. Honestraj (Contact No.: +91 99015 38692) or Ozone representative Ms. Nalina / Mr. Saravana Kumar (Contact No.: +91 99800 33658). In case of such snags reported we assure to complete the same before the completion of your interior/woodworks and final handover.

Thanks & Regards,"

(Emphasis added)

The afore-quoted communications would clearly indicate that

Everytime illusory assurances are handed over to the senior citizens.

16. It is trite that retirement homes or old age homes as they

call it, are developed to provide a social environment where seniors

can interact with their peers and the retirees and have a

comfortable living experience through modern developments. It is

this that is projected by the petitioner while developing the project

'Serene Urbana'. The highlights projected at the time when the

project was advertised and retired people were lured are as follows:

"Highlights of Urbana Project:

1) First and the Biggest Retirement Housing with 'Freehold property' within the vicinity of Bangalore City.

2) Close to about 10 Kilometers from Devenahalli Town and with easy public road access.

3) The proposed project is very close to "GVK International Airport" @ Bangalore.

4) Plenty of green area for refreshing natural environment.

5) Specially designed for senior lifestyle with ramps and hand rails in all important areas.

6) Stretcher lifts for emergency evacuations.

7) Centrally air-conditioned medical and nursing facilities, assisted care with a resident doctor, nurse and physiotherapist.

8)    Fully stationed ambulance.

9)    Luxurious centrally air-conditioned     dining   facilities   with
      dietician monitored hygienic food.

10) Housekeeping services including cleaning and moping inside the house.

11) 24/7 Security.

12) 24/7 Electrical, Plumbing and other preventive maintenance services.

13) Garbage clearing arrangements.

14) Travel services including pick up drop and ticketing.

15) Recreation arrangements including social evenings, dance and music.

16) Religious tours and holidays.

17) Picnics and Tours, visits to Theatres, restaurants and shopping malls.

18) Entertainment activities for residents.

19) Event management services.

20) Arrangement for celebrations like birthdays, wedding anniversaries etc.

21) Payment of bills and taxes.

22) Arrangement of Banking Facility.

23) Guest Houses for Guests and relatives.

24) Geriatric Gym. Ayurvedic Massage Centre.

25) Travel and Tour Desk Facilities.

26) Laundry Facilities.

27) Library and Reading Room.

28) Open Air Theatre.

29) Indoor TV Room.

30) Badminton Court.

31) Outdoor Sports Arena.

32) Jogging Track."

The aforesaid is part of communication to the home buyers. It is on

the aforesaid assurance of delivery of the project with all the

aforesaid amenities within the time frame, the retired people/ senior

citizens have invested. The investment of senior citizens sometimes

is from out of the entire savings, of their life time, or by raising

finance from financial institutions who would face the wrath of

proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, if they do not repay the

amount. They sometimes neither have the money nor the

apartments for them to live in. Home buyers are dodged by the

developers as could be gathered from mushrooming of cases before

the Authority and before this Court alleging that the projects are

continuing beyond 10 years and the home buyers are not in a

position to occupy the same.

17. The projection is that it is not an 'on-going project'. The

contents of projection suffer from material suppression of facts, as

none of the documents are placed on record by the petitioner while

securing an interim order at the hands of this Court. It is the 2nd

respondent who has placed every document on record and the

documents would demonstrate that the petitioner has played fraud

with the Gram Panchayat in securing occupancy certificate. Such

fraud cannot be played only by the hands of the developer or

by the hands of the competent officers, it can be played only

when the hands of the competent officers are in the glove of

the developers. It is an action hand in glove.

18. Therefore, it is necessary to admonish the competent

authorities who are empowered to issue occupancy certificates not

to sit in four corners of their air-conditioned chambers and issue

occupancy certificates, to the developers, for their asking. The

Authorities henceforth shall inspect the property, satisfy themselves

whether occupancy certificate can be issued in terms of law, and

only then issue such occupancy certificate, failing which those

officers who handle such files where grant of occupancy certificate is

sought, would be solely responsible and accountable for issuance of

illegal occupancy certificates. Looking at the large increase in the

number of cases which call in question reckless issuance of

occupancy certificates, it has become necessary to direct the State

Government to issue necessary circular in the form of guidelines to

the Authorities who handle grant of occupancy certificates to strictly

adhere to the conditions necessary to be looked into while granting

occupancy certificates. The circular shall also bear that in the event

of scrutiny of such occupancy certificates, if it is found that they are

issued contrary to law, those officers would become open to

initiation of departmental enquiry, or in a given case registration of

crime, as well against those officers. The developers should bear in

mind, particularly of those projects, which involve retirement homes

or homes for senior citizens, should not make those citizens run

pillar to post, to secure accommodation, after them having paid

substantial amount. It is necessary to bear in mind that

retired people should not be made to re-tire themselves.

19. For the aforesaid reasons, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Writ Petition stands dismissed.

(ii) It is declared that 'Serene Urbana', project of the

petitioner was an 'on-going project' as on 10-07-2017,

the date on which the Rules come into force.

(iii) The petitioner, as directed by the Karnataka Real Estate

Regulatory Authority, within 4 weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order, register itself before

Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

(iv) The State Government, through the Departments of

Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and Urban

Development, shall issue necessary circulars to all the

authorities who are empowered to grant occupancy

certificates, bearing in mind the observations made in

the course of the order.

(v) The circular, aforesaid, shall be issued within 8 weeks

from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Compliance of such issuance be placed before this Court

in these proceedings, within the expiry of the said 8

weeks.

(vi) Registry shall forward a copy of this order to the Chief

Secretary, Government of Karnataka for its compliance

and reporting of such compliance.

Sd/-

JUDGE

bkp CT:SS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter