Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Hariba vs Sri.Shivaputra And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 3687 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3687 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri.Hariba vs Sri.Shivaputra And Anr on 7 February, 2024

                                                 -1-
                                                       NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372
                                                        MFA No. 201326 of 2017




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                      KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                            BEFORE

                        THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.201326 OF 2017 (MV-I)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI.HARIBA S/O BABU JAMIR @ JAVIR,
                   AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
                   R/O. DOMANAL, TQ: & DIST: VIJAYPUR.
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. S. S. MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   SRI. SHIVAPUTRA S/O LAXMAN PUTHANI,
                        AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                        R/O. A/POST NIMBAL (KD), TQ: INDI,
                        DIST: VIJAYPUR-586101.

Digitally signed   2.   THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
by KHAJAAMEEN           UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD,
L MALAGHAN
                        S.S. FRONT ROAD, VIJAYPUR-586101.
Location: High
Court of                                                       ...RESPONDENTS
Karnataka
                   (BY SMT. ANURADHA DESAI, ADV. FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1
                    DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 01.02.2018)

                          THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT,
                   PRAYING TO ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT BY
                   SUITABLY    MODIFYING   THE    JUDGMENT   DATED-18.04.2017
                   PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
                   AND MEMBER MACT-V, VIJAYAPUR IN MVC NO.2027/2013.
                              -2-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372
                                        MFA No. 201326 of 2017




     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                         JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the award dated 18.04.2017, passed in

MVC No.2027/2013, by the Principal Senior Civil Judge

And MACT-V, Vijayapura, the claimant is before this court

seeking enhancement of the compensation.

2. The claim petition is filed seeking compensation

of an amount of Rs.18,85,000/- for the injuries sustained

by the claimant. According to the Doctor there is

shortening of left lower limb of the claimant by 1½ inch

and the claimant had sustained 36% disability to the limb

and the court below had considered 12% as the disability.

It is the case of the claimant that he was earning an

amount of Rs.10,000/- p.m., working as Agriculture coolie

and the court below had taken an amount of Rs.6,000/-

and granted compensation as per the table given below:

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372

Heads Compensation Awarded

1. Injury, Pain and Sufferings : Rs. 30,000/-

2. Attendant Charges : Rs. 7,000/-

3. Conveyance charges : Rs. 7,000/-

4. Food and Nourishment : Rs. 7,000/-

5. Medical Expenses : Rs. 70,038/-

6. Loss Of Future Income : Rs. 1,46,880/-

7. Loss of future amenities & : Rs. 32,082/-

agony TOTAL : Rs. 3,00,000/-

3. Learned counsel appearing for the claimant

submits that the compensation amount awarded by the

court below is on the lower side. He submitted that this is

an accident of the year 2013, the court below had taken

the income at Rs.6,000/- p.m., which is on lower side. He

submits that as there is shortening of leg it would have an

impact on his future life and hence considering the

disability at 1/3rd was not appropriate. It is further

submitted that no amounts were granted towards loss of

income during laid up and the amounts that was granted

towards Loss Of Amenities was on lower side. He further

submits that the amounts that were granted by the court

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372

below on other heads was also not just and reasonable

compensation.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the insurance

company submits that when the doctor has given evidence

that the disability itself is 36% to the particular limb the

court below had rightly taken the disability at 12%. No

grounds are made out for enhancement of the

compensation and the court below had reasonably granted

the compensation.

5. Having heard the learned counsel on either side

perused the material on record. In this case, the claimant

had sustained one grievous injury. The court below under

the head of pain and suffering granted an amount of

Rs.30,000/-. Considering that the claimant had sustained

one fracture injury which is a grievous injury this Court is

granting an amount of Rs.40,000/-. Then coming to the

income though it is stated that the claimant was earning

Rs.10,000/- p.m., there is no evidence in this regard. As

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372

this is an accident of 2013 as per the chart prepared by

the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, this Court is

taking the notional income at of Rs.7,000/- p.m., and

taking the laid up period as three months, the claimant is

entitled for an amount of Rs.21,000/- (Rs.7,000 x 3)

towards loss of income during laid up period. Coming

to the loss of future income the doctor had deposed that

the claimant had suffered 36% disability to the particular

limb and court below had taken the disability of 12%, this

court is not able to appreciate the contention of the

learned counsel for the claimant that it should have been

more than that. The court below had rightly taken the

disability at 12%. However, as the income is taken at

Rs.7,000/- p.m., hence the claimant is entitled for an

amount of Rs.1,71,360/- (Rs.7,000 x 12 x 17x 12/100)

under the head of loss of future income. The

compensation awarded by the court below under the head

of Medical Expenses is Rs.70,038/- which is as per the

evidence on record and the same do not require any

interference. Considering the shortening of the limb by 1½

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372

inch and the impact that would have on future life under

head of loss of amenities this Court is granting an

amount of Rs.45,000/-. Towards transport, attendant

and nourishment the court below had granted an

amount of Rs.7,000/- each i.e., Rs.21,000/- which is

reasonable and no grounds are made out for enhancement

of the same.

6. Further in the light of the law laid down by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V.MEKALA vs. M.

MALATHI AND ANOTHER1, the claimant is entitled for an

amount of Rs.10,000/- towards Legal Expenses.

7. The claimant is therefore, entitled to the

compensation under the following heads:

                           Heads                    Compensation
                                                      Awarded
         1.    Injury, Pain and Sufferings    :   Rs.      40,000/-
         2.    Attendant, Conveyance, Food    :   Rs.      21,000/-
               and Nourishment
         3.    Medical Expenses               :   Rs.      70,038/-
         4.    Loss Of Future Income          :   Rs.     1,71,360/-



    (2014) 11 SCC 178

                                            NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372





    5.      Loss of future amenities &       :   Rs.    45,000/-
            agony
    6.      Loss of Income during laid up    :   Rs.    21,000/-
            period
    7.      Legal Expenses                   :   Rs.    10,000/-
            TOTAL                            :   Rs.   3,78,398/-



8. Accordingly, the Appeal is Partly Allowed,

enhancing the compensation amount from an amount of

Rs.3,00,000/- to an amount of Rs.3,78,398/-.

i) The enhanced amount shall carry interest at 6%

p.a. from the date of petition till the date of

realization.

ii) The respondent - insurance company shall

deposit the amount within a period of eight

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the

judgment. On such deposit, the claimant is

entitled to withdraw the entire amount without

furnishing any security.

iii) Registry is directed to return the Trial Court

Records to the Tribunal, along with certified

NC: 2024:KHC-K:1372

copy of the order passed by this Court forthwith

without any delay.

iv) No costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

JJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter