Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3544 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:2574
RP No. 100132 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
REVIEW PETITION NO. 100132 OF 2022
IN MFA NO.100286/2016 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
MLBCC DIV.NO.2, NAVILUTEERTH,
TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAUM-551126.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.S.M.TONNE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, SECTOR NO.60,
NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587103.
2. SRI.ISHWARAPPA BASAPPA TOTAGER
AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HOOLI, TAL: SAUNDATTI,
DIST: BELAGAVI-591126.
VIJAYALAKSHMI
M KANKUPPI ...RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by
VIJAYALAKSHMI M
KANKUPPI
Date: 2024.02.13
10:48:31 +0530
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED U/O 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC.
114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO.
64/2011 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
SAUNDATTI; CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF MFA NO.100286/2016
DISPOSED ON 26.02.2016 BY THIS HON'BLE COURT FROM THE
REGISTRY; ALLOW THE REVIEW AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
PASSED IN MAF NO.100286/2016 DISPOSED ON 26.02.2016
CORRECT THE SAME BY REFIXING THE MARKET VALUE AT RS.
3,00,000/- PER ACRE INSTEAD OF RS.5,08,000/- PER ACRE.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:2574
RP No. 100132 of 2022
ORDER
Though this review petition was filed on 18.11.2022,
the matter was listed before the Court on 23.06.2023. At
the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a
week's time was granted to comply with the office
objections. Again, the matter was listed on 13.07.2023. At
the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a
week's time was granted. Yet again the matter was listed on
19.01.2024. At the request of the learned counsel for the
petitioner, two weeks time was granted. In spite of granting
sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has not complied with
the office objections. It seems that the petitioner is not
interested in prosecuting the review petition.
Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed for non-
compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kmv ct: vh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!