Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Abeeb Ulla vs M/S Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 3088 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3088 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Abeeb Ulla vs M/S Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd on 1 February, 2024

Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Bench: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

                                                      -1-
                                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:4455
                                                              MFA No. 4216 of 2018




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                 DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

                                                   BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
                          MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4216 OF 2018 (MV-I)
                          BETWEEN:

                                SRI. ABEEB ULLA,
                                S/O AHAMMED SAB,
                                AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                                R/O RENUKA NAGAR, BASAVANAHALLI,
                                KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK,
                                BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
                                                                         ...APPELLANT
                          (BY SRI. H.B. SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE)

                          AND:

                          1.    M/S RELIANCE GENERAL
                                INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
Digitally signed by JAI         BY ITS MANAGER,
JYOTHI J
Location: HIGH COURT            NO.28, CENTENARY BUILDING,
OF KARNATAKA
                                5TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 11.

                          2.    SRI. ABHISHEK GOWDA,
                                S/O MANJUNATHA H, MAJOR,
                                RESIDENT OF NO.86,
                                1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS,
                                VIJAYALAKSHMI LAYOUT,
                                ABBIGERE, CHIKKABANAVARA,
                                BANGALORE - 560 090.
                                                                       ...RESPONDENTS
                          (BY SRI. H.C. BETSUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:4455
                                     MFA No. 4216 of 2018




   R2 NOTICE DISPENSED WITH VIDE ORDER DATED
   15.12.2022)

      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08/02/2018, PASSED IN MVC
NO.1015/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDITIONAL SMALL
CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, (SCCH-17), BENGALURU, PARTLY
ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND
SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS

DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                       JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the claimant challenging the

judgment and award dated 08.02.2018, passed by the

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-17), in

MVC No.1015/2017, seeking enhancement of

compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

2. The factum of accident, injuries sustained by the

claimant and coverage of insurance are not in dispute.

3. Heard the arguments of both sides and perused

the records.

NC: 2024:KHC:4455

4. In the present case, the Tribunal has awarded

compensation as under:

1 Towards pain and suffering Rs.50,000/- 2 Towards attendant charges, extra Rs.10,000/-

food and conveyance expenses 3 Towards medical expenses Rs.1,580/- 4 Towards loss of income during Rs.24,000/-

laid up period 5 Towards loss of income due to Rs.1,58,400/-

permanent disability

6. Towards loss of future amenities Rs.20,000/-

and happiness

7. Towards future medical expenses Rs.20,000/-

Total Rs.2,83,980/-

5. In the present case, from the medical evidence on

record, it is proved that the claimant had suffered the

following injury:-

i. Closed fracture both bones (Tibia and Fibula) of

left leg distal one third.

6. The Tribunal while determining the compensation

has not adopted the correct parameters. Hence, claimant

is entitled for compensation.

7. Considering the nature of injuries sustained by

the claimant, the compensation of Rs.50,000/- awarded by

NC: 2024:KHC:4455

the Tribunal under the head 'pain and sufferings' is on the

lesser side. Hence, the same is enhanced to Rs.60,000/-.

8. The Tribunal has awarded a lesser sum of

Rs.10,000/- under the head 'Attendant charges, extra

food, nourishment and conveyance expenses'. The same is

enhanced to Rs.20,000/-.

9. The claimant has produced medical bills and

receipts for Rs.12,235/- but the Tribunal has granted only

Rs.1,580/- on the ground that the claimant had purchased

medicines at Tumkur and it is recorded that Bill No.5 to 54

pertains to H.N.Medicals, Kyathasandra, Tumkur and in

the said bills, name of Doctor and date is not mentioned

and the prescriptions of said bills are not produced.

Therefore, the Tribunal suspected the medical bills and

rejected the same. Just because there is no doctor name

and date is not mentioned and the medicines are

purchased from Tumkur, it cannot be suspected as it is

quite natural that some medicines are not available in all

places and since the said medicines are available at

NC: 2024:KHC:4455

Tumkur, the claimant might have purchased the same.

Therefore, rejection of medical bills is not correct.

Accordingly, compensation of Rs.12,235/- is awarded

towards 'Medical expenses'.

10. The Tribunal has awarded a lesser sum of

Rs.20,000/- under the head 'Loss of amenities'. The same

is enhanced to Rs.35,000/-.

11. The compensation of Rs.20,000/- awarded by

the Tribunal under the head 'Future Medical Expenses' is

just and proper. Hence, the same is kept intact.

12. As per Ex.P.12 - salary certificate, the claimant

was drawing salary of Rs.24,000/- per month as an

Electrician. But the author of the said salary certificate is

not examined and the same is found to be suspicious. The

accident is of the year 2017. The notional income of the

claimant is to be taken at Rs.11,000/- per month as

recognized by the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authorities. The claimant was aged about 35 years at the

NC: 2024:KHC:4455

time of the accident. The appropriate multiplier applicable

is '16'. The doctor has stated that the claimant has

suffered 33.9% disability towards left lower limb and 17%

towards whole body. The Tribunal has rightly taken 15%

disability to the whole body. Therefore, loss of income

due to disability are reassessed and quantified as:-

11,000 x 12 x 16 x 15/100 = 3,16,800/-

13. The Tribunal has awarded a lesser sum of

Rs.24,000/- under the head 'Loss of income during laid up

period and rest period'. Considering the nature of injuries

and fracture sustained by the claimant, the same is

enhanced to Rs.33,000/- (Rs.11,000/- x 3 months).

14. Thus, in all, the appellant/claimant is entitled for

total compensation under various heads as follows:

Sl.No. Particulars Rs. Tribunal High Court 1 Towards pain and suffering Rs. 50,000/- 60,000/-

2      Towards attendant
       charges,     food,
       nourishment    and
       conveyance            Rs.       10,000/-        20,000/-
3      Medical expenses      Rs.        1,580/-        12,235/-

                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:4455





4          Loss of income
           during      laid    up
           period                    Rs.     24,000/-      33,000/-
5          Loss of income due
           to        permanent
           disability                Rs.    1,58,400/-   3,16,800/-
6          Loss     of     future
           amenities         and
           happiness                 Rs.     20,000/-      35,000/-
7          Towards         future
           medical expenses          Rs.      20,000/-   20,000/-
                  TOTAL              Rs.   4,21,307/- 4,97,035/-


15. The Tribunal has awarded compensation of

Rs.2,83,980/-, but the appellant/claimant is entitled for

total compensation of Rs.4,97,035/-. Hence, the

appellant/claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation of

Rs.75,728/- (Rs.2,83,980/- - Rs.4,97,035/-), along with

interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of

petition till the date of realization, in addition to what has

been awarded by the Tribunal.

16. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

i. The appeal is allowed-in-part.

NC: 2024:KHC:4455

ii. The judgment and award passed by the Tribunal

in MVC No.1015/2017 dated 08.02.2018 by the

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru

(SCCH-17), is hereby modified holding that the

claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation

of Rs.75,728/- along with interest @ 6% p.a.,

from the date of petition till its realization, in

addition to what has been awarded by the

Tribunal.

iii. Costs made easy.

iv.    Ordered accordingly.

v.     The other observations and findings of the

       Tribunal are kept in tact.




                                       Sd/-
                                      JUDGE




MH/-

CT: BHK
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter