Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19739 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:31606
RFA No. 53 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. KALYANI ACHARTHI
W/O LATE SRINIVASA ACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.
2. SMT. YASHODA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.
3. SHEKAR ACHAR
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
4. GANESH ACHAR
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
5. RAGHAVENDRA ACHAR
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
Digitally 6. SMT. VINODA
signed by AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
MALATESH
KC
NO.2 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF
Location:
HIGH LATE SRINIVAS ACHAR.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA ALL ARE RESIDING AT KADINAKONDA,
KANDAVARA VILLAGE,
MOODLAKATTE POST,
KUNDAPURA TALUK,
UDUPI DISTRICT 576 201.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:31606
RFA No. 53 of 2018
AND:
1. LAKSHMI ACHARTHI
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS.
W/O LATE NARAYANA ACHARY
2. SMT. LALITHA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.
3. KRISHNAYYA ACHARY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.
4. SMT. SHARADA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
5. SMT. SAROJA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
6. CHANDRA ACHARY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
7. SMT. JYOTHI
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
8. SMT. GEETHA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
NO.2 TO 8 ARE CHILDREN OF
LATE NARAYANA ACHARY,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O KADINAKONDA, KANDAVARA VILLAGE,
MOODLAKATTE POST,
KUNDAPURA TALUK,
UDUPI DISTRICT 576 201.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R7 AND R8 ARE
SERVED AND UNREPRENSETED;
V/O DATED 06.08.2024, APPEAL DISMISSED
AGAINST DECEASED R3)
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:31606
RFA No. 53 of 2018
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2017 PASSED IN
OS.NO.11/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
KUNDAPURA, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND
SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Sri.K.Srihari, learned counsel for the appellants prays
time to take appropriate steps in respect of respondent No.3.
Sufficient time was already granted. Hence, no
justification. Accordingly, appeal against respondent No.3
stands dismissed.
Paper books are not filed despite granting sufficient time.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!