Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr K Deepak Prabhu vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 19729 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19729 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Mr K Deepak Prabhu vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 August, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                              -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:31119
                                                       CRL.P No. 7778 of 2024




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                           CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7778 OF 2024

                 BETWEEN:


                 1.    MR K DEEPAK PRABHU
                       S/O LATE B KRISHNAMURTHY
                       AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
                       R/AT 48, 5TH MAIN, VR LAYOUT
                       OPPOSITE TO KEB OFFICE MATHIKERE,
                       BANGALORE NORTH,
                       KARNATAKA - 560054


                 2.    MRS KUMUDA
                       W/O LATE B KRISHNAMURTHY
                       AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
                       R/AT 48, 5TH MAIN, VR LAYOUT
                       OPPOSITE TO KEB OFFICE MATHIKERE,
                       BANGALORE NORTH,
Digitally signed       KARNATAKA - 560054
by NAGAVENI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF         3.    MRS MONISHA
KARNATAKA              D/O LATE B KRISHNAMURTHY
                       AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
                       R/AT 48, 5TH MAIN, VR LAYOUT
                       OPPOSITE TO KEB OFFICE MATHIKERE,
                       BANGALORE NORTH,
                       KARNATAKA - 560054

                                                                ...PETITIONERS
                 (BY SMT. JAYASHREE PATIL, ADVOCATE)
                               -2-
                                         NC: 2024:KHC:31119
                                     CRL.P No. 7778 of 2024




AND:


1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     ARSIKERE TOWN PS
     DISTRICT HASSAN
     REPRESENTED BY S.P.P
     HIGH COURT COMPLEX
     BANGALORE - 560001


2.   MRS T A KEERTHANA
     W/O K DEEPAK PRABHU
     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
     OCCUPATION - MUSIC TEACHER
     R/AT DURGA APARTMENT,
     FIRST FLOOR, HULIYAR ROAD,
     ARSIKERE, HASSAN DISTRICT,
     KARNATAKA - 573103

                                             ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1)


      THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE
FIR PRODUCED AS DOCUMENT NO.2 AND CHARGE SHEET FILED BY
THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BY SHO ARSIKERE TOWN POLICE STATION
IN C.C.NO.222/2023 DOCUMENT NO.3 IN CR.NO.0152/2022
DOCUMENT NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 506 R/W SEC. 34
OF IPC R/W SEC. 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS
WHICH PS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.)
AND JMFC COURT, ARSIKERE DISTRICT, AND THE 1ST RESPONDENT
POLICE HAS FILED CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THIS PETITIONERS IN
C.C.NO.222/2023 AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS WHICH ARE
PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
COURT IS HEREBY PRODUCED AS DOCUMENT NO.4, ARSIKERE
DISTRICT.


    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:    HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                                         -3-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:31119
                                              CRL.P No. 7778 of 2024




                                 ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question

the proceedings in C.C.No.222/2023 pending before the Civil

Judge (Sr.Dn.) J.M.F.C. Court, Arsikere, for offences punishable

under Sections 498A and 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC

and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard the learned counsel Smt. Jayashree Patil,

appearing for the petitioners and the learned High Court

Government Pleader Smt. Sowmya R., appearing for

respondent No.1.

3. Learned HCGP on instructions would submit that the

charges have been framed and the matter is set at the stage of

evidence.

4. Therefore, interference at this stage would run foul

of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Minakshi Bala

v. Sudhir Kumar1.

(1994) 4 SCC 142

NC: 2024:KHC:31119

5. The petitioners are permitted to urge all the

contentions that are now urged before the concerned Court.

There is no reason to disbelieve that the concerned Court would

not consider the same at an appropriate time.

6. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such

remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

KG

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter