Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19552 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:31050
RFA No. 32 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 32 OF 2015 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT NEELAMMA
W/O NAGANNA
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
D/O LATE NANJAPPA
R/O KOLLIGANAHALLI VILLAGE
HAROHALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511
2. SMT CHANDRAMMA
W/O VENKATARAMANAPPA
D/O LATE NANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
Digitally signed
by VIDYA G R R/O KAGGALAHALLI VILLAGE
Location: HIGH
COURT OF KANAKAPURA TALUK
KARNATAKA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511
... APPELLANTS
[APPELLANT NO.1 - SMT. NEELAMMA CALLED OUT - (ABSENT);
APPELLANT NO.2 - SMT. CHANDRAMMA - (DEAD)]
AND:
1. SIDDARAJU
S/O LATE LINGAPPA @ LINGAIAH
AGED MAJOR
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:31050
RFA No. 32 of 2015
R/O KOLLIGANAHALLI VILLAGE
HAROHALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511
2. SMT THAYAMMA
W/O LATE NANJAPPA
D/O LINGAPPA @ LINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/O PUTTERAMMANA DODDI
BIDADI HOBLI
RAMANAGARA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511
3. SMT GOWRAMMA
W/O RAMESH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R/O KOLLIGANAHALLI VILLAGE
HAROHALLI HOBLI
KANAKAPURA TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571 511
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI G.B. NANDISH GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R3 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.10.2014 PASSED IN
O.S.411/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,
CJM, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION
AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:31050
RFA No. 32 of 2015
ORAL JUDGMENT
The Court notice issued to appellant No.1 is duly
served. The name of appellant No.1 is called out and she
is absent and has not chosen to engage any Advocate to
appear on her behalf. Further, the Court notice issued to
appellant No.2 is returned with an endorsement that
appellant No.2 is 'dead'.
2. Left with no other alternative, the appeal stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
VGR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!