Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri H S Rafeeq Ahmed vs Smt. Shivarathna
2024 Latest Caselaw 19366 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19366 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri H S Rafeeq Ahmed vs Smt. Shivarathna on 2 August, 2024

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                             -1-
                                                       NC: 2024:KHC:30631
                                                     WP No. 19911 of 2024




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

                                         BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 19911 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)


                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SRI. H.S. RAFEEQ AHMED,
                        S/O LATE HABEEB-UR-REHMAN SAHEB,
                        AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
                        R/AT NAGARATHPET,
                        SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
                        CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT

                   2.   SRI. SYED TAJ PASHA
                        S/O SYED AZAZ PASHA,
                        AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
                        R/AT KADIRIPALYA STREET,
                        SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
                        CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT

                   3.   SRI. AMEER JAN
Digitally signed
by JUANITA              S/O PAKRUDEEN SAB,
THEJESWINI              AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
Location: HIGH          R/AT KARMIKARA NAGAR,
COURT OF                SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
KARNATAKA               CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT

                   4.   SRI. HYDER ALI PASHA
                        S/O ABDUL ALI,
                        AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
                        R/AT DASHADPET,
                        SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
                        CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.

                   5.   SRI. S. BUDDAN
                              -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC:30631
                                    WP No. 19911 of 2024




     S/O L GHOWSPEER SAB,
     AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
     R/AT NEAR VIJAYALAKSHMI
     SIDLAGHATTA TALUK,
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT
                                       ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA S.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:

1.   SMT. SHIVARATHNA,
     D/O KRISHNAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
     R/AT BELATHRU COLONY,
     KADUGODI(P),
     BENGALURU 560 067.

2.   SRI. H. AHMAD PASHA BABU,
     S/O LATE H. ABDUL WAHAB SAB,
     AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
     R/AT NO.1944.
     OLD HOSPITAL ROAD,
     SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.

3.   SRI. T SYED MUNEER AHMAD
     S/O LATE SYED GAFFAR PASHA,
     AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
     R/AT K.K. PETE,
     SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.

4.   SMT. GULAB JAN
     W/O LATE K IMAM SHARIEF,
     AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
     R/AT KHAZI STREET,
     NEAR STATE BANK OF MYSORE,
     SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
5.   SRI. B. AMAJAD PASHA
     S/O LATE BASHA SAB,
                           -3-
                                    NC: 2024:KHC:30631
                                  WP No. 19911 of 2024




     AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
     R/AT DIDBBURAHALLI ROAD,
     BEHIND PETROL BANK,
     SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
     CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
6.   SRI. ARUN KUMAR
     S/O SOMASHEKAR,
     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
     R/AT KUNDALAGURKI VILLAGE,
     KASABA HOBLI,
     SIDLAGHATTA TALUK,
     CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
7.   SRI. R. NARENDRA
     S/O LATE RAJAPPA,
     AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
     R/AT WARD NO.5,
     YELAHANKA STREET,
     DEVANAHALLI TOWN,
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

8.   SRI. RAGHU
     S/O LATE HARISHANKAR,
     AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
     R/AT GANDHI NAGAR,
     SIDLAGHATTA TOWN,
     SIDLAGHATTA TALUK,
     CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
                                    ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. OM KUMAR R., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER 19.06.2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC SHIDLAGATTA, IN OS NO. 29/2020,
VIDE ANNEXURE-A DISMISSING THE IA NO. 20,
APPLICATION UNDER SEC 151 OF CPC DATED 27.01.2024
FILED FOR PERMISSION TO FILE WRITTEN STATEMENT
AND SUCH OTHER ORDER AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS
FIT AND ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                   -4-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:30631
                                            WP No. 19911 of 2024




CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

                        ORAL ORDER

to 7 in the suit are before this Court aggrieved of the

rejections of the Interlocutory Application filed by the

petitioners seeking permission to file written

statement and to go on with the proceedings.

2. It is clear from the impugned order and the

submissions made by the learned counsel at the Bar

that the Trial Court has rejected the Application on the

ground that the Application is filed at the fag end of

the proceedings viz., when the matter has been

posted for judgment. However, on hearing the

learned counsel for the petitioners this Court finds that

in the suit filed at the hands of respondent No.1

herein/plaintiff seeking the Permanent Injunction

against the defendants, respondent No.1-Sri.H.S.

Raffeq Ahmed and others have been arraigned as the

defendants.

NC: 2024:KHC:30631

3. It is the contention of defendant No.1/

petitioner No.1 herein that he is the Secretary of the

Pyaragan Educational Society and the said Society has

purchased 4 Acres of land in old Sy.No.91/A

Re.Sy.Nos.2/1, 2/9 situated at Kadadanakunte Village,

Kasaba Hobli, Shidlaghatta Taluk under a registered

sale deed dated 16.12.1979. It is stated in the written

statement filed along with the Application that one

Sri.K.Munivenkatappa was the owner of the 7 Acres

and 39 Guntas of land in the said survey number.

After his demise there was a partition in the family

and 2 Acres each fell to the share of

Sri.K.M.Ramachandrappa and Sri. Ramanjinappa. The

Pyaragan Educational Trust has purchased 4 Acres of

land from the said Sri.K.Ramachandrappa and

Sri.Ramanjinappa. Initially, there was some problem

faced by the Trust in getting the Khata registered in

the revenue records. However, subsequently, the

name of the purchaser has been registered in the

Khata.

NC: 2024:KHC:30631

4. Having regard to the contentions sought to be

raised in the written statement, this Court is of the

considered opinion that the although the Application

has been filed very belatedly, nevertheless, having

regard to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court

in the case of Sylam Advocates Bar Association vs.

Union of India, (2005)6 SCC 344 which was

consequently, followed in the case of Zolba vs.

Keshao and others, (2008)11 SCC 769, wherein it

was held that the provisions including the proviso to

Order VIII Rule 1 of the CPC are not mandatory but

directory in nature and it would be open to the Court

to permit the defendant to file written statement even

after the expiry of the statutory period, in the

exceptional cases, this Court is of the considered

opinion that since defendant No.1 is claiming that an

Educational Trust viz., Pyaragan Educational Society

has purchased 4 Acres of land in Sy.No.91/A,

Re.Sy.Nos.2/1 and 2/9 and the survey number

mentioned in the suit schedule is also Sy.No.2/9, an

NC: 2024:KHC:30631

opportunity should be given to the petitioners herein

to file written statement and go on with the matter.

5. Consequently, this Court proceeds to pass the

following:

ORDER

i. The writ petition is allowed while

imposing the cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees

Five Thousand only) on the petitioners

payable to the plaintiff before the Trial

Court.

ii. I.A.No.XX filed in O.S.No.29/2020 on the

file of Principal Civil Judge and JMFC.,

Shidlaghatta, is hereby allowed.

iii. The written statement filed by defendant

Nos.1 and 4 to 7 is taken on record.

to 7 are hereby directed to lead evidence

and enable cross-examination at the

hands of the plaintiff. If an application is

NC: 2024:KHC:30631

filed by the said defendants to permit

cross-examination of the plaintiff's

witnesses, the same shall be allowed and

cross-examination shall also be

concluded.

iv. Issues shall also to be framed

accordingly, and the entire proceedings

shall be concluded within a period of two

months from 12th of August 2024.

v. The parties are hereby directed to be

present before the Principal Civil Judge

and JMFC., Shidlaghatta, on 12th of

August, 2024, without waiting for further

notice.

vi. The suit shall be disposed of within a

period of two months from today.

Sd/-

(R DEVDAS) JUDGE TMP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter