Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Narayanamma vs National Insurance Co Ltd
2024 Latest Caselaw 11349 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11349 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt Narayanamma vs National Insurance Co Ltd on 25 April, 2024

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                                 -1-
                                                            NC: 2024:KHC:16608
                                                          MFA No. 7376 of 2016




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7376 OF 2016(MV-D)
                   BETWEEN:

                   1.     SMT. NARAYANAMMA
                          W/O MUNISWAMAPPA,
                          AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
                   2.     GOVINDARAJU
                          S/O MUNISWAMAPPA,
                          AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
                          BOTH ARE R/AT NO.48/2,
                          MEHSWARAMMA TEMPLE,
                          YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064.
                                                                 ...APPELLANTS
                   (BY SRI. SHANTHARAJ.K., ADVOCATE)
                   AND:
                   1.     NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                          REGIONAL OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR,
                          SUBARAM COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD,
Digitally signed by       BANGALORE-01.
THEJASKUMAR N
                          REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA           2.    ANILKUMAR.S
                          MAJOR,
                          S/O SHAMANNA,
                          BYANNAPALYA,
                          TALAGATTAPURA POST,
                          BANGALORE-560 062.

                   3.     ANIL KUMAR
                          S/O SHAMANNA,
                          INDRISINAHALLI VILLAGE,
                          DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
                          BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.
                                                               ...RESPONDENTS
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:16608
                                          MFA No. 7376 of 2016




(BY SRI. M.S.SRIRAM., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
  NOTICE TO R2 & R3-DISPENSED WITH
  V/O DATED:04.12.2023)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:24.08.2015
PASSED IN MVC NO.3896/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, XXVIII ACMM, MACT,
BENGALURU.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                           JUDGMENT

Sri.Shantharaj.K., learned counsel for the appellants has

appeared in person.

2. The claimants have assailed the Judgment of the

Tribunal in this appeal seeking enhancement of the

compensation.

3. Learned counsel for the respective parties have

urged several contentions. Heard, the contentions urged on

behalf of the respective parties and perused the appeal papers

with utmost care.

NC: 2024:KHC:16608

4. The point that requires consideration is whether the

claimants are entitled for enhanced compensation.

5. The Claimant/s appeal is one for enhancement of

compensation. The grounds urged in the present appeal is that

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is meager.

It is noticed that the Tribunal has awarded compensation

of Rs.1,20,000/- towards Loss of dependency. In the absence

of any proof of income, the chart prepared by the Legal Service

Authority must be taken into consideration.

As per the chart, the salary of the deceased must be

taken as Rs.7,000/- per month, if the accident is occurred in

the year 2012. The age of the deceased was 70 years as on the

date of accident, hence the multiplier 5 is to be adopted.

Hence, the amount towards the loss of dependency is as under:

CALCULATION OF LOSS OF DEPENDENCY

7,000 ÷ 3 = 2,333

7,000 - 2,333 = 4,667

4,667 x 12 x 5 = 2,80,020 Rs.2,80,020/-

NC: 2024:KHC:16608

In the present case, the deceased left behind his wife and

son. Hence, they are entitled to compensation under the head

"Loss of consortium". In view of law laid down by the Apex

Court in PRANAY SETHI's case, the interest should be

considered to the loss of consortium at the rate of 10% per

annum for every three years.

40,000 X 10/100 X 2 times = Rs.8,000/-

40,000 + 8,000 = Rs.48,000/-

Rs.48,000/- X 2 = Rs.96,000/-.

Therefore, the claimants are entitled for compensation of

Rs.96,000/- towards loss of consortium.

This Court deems it appropriate to award Rs.33,000/-

(Rupees Thirty Three Thousand only) towards loss of estate and

transportation, funeral expenses.

The compensation of Rs.5,350/- awarded towards

medical expenses remains intact.

6. Accordingly, this Court reassess the compensation

as under:-

NC: 2024:KHC:16608

1. Towards loss of 2,80,020 Rs.2,80,020/-

dependency

2. Towards loss of 96,000 Rs.96,000/-

Consortium

3. Loss of estate, 33,000 Rs.33,000/-

   transportation              and

   funeral expenses.

4. Medical expenses                          5,350             Rs.5,350/-

                      Reassessed Compensation:                Rs.4,14,370/-


          7.   Hence, the following:

                                        ORDER

                1.     The       Miscellaneous       First   appeal   is

          allowed      and      the   Judgment       dated:24.08.2015

passed by the MACT, Bengaluru (SCCH-13) in

M.V.C No.3896/2012 is modified to the extent

stated hereinabove.

2. The claimants are entitled for reassessed

compensation of Rs.4,14,370/- (Rupees Four Lakh

Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred and Seventy

only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of

the claim petition till the date of realization.

NC: 2024:KHC:16608

3. The Insurance Company is directed to

deposit enhanced compensation amount along with

6% interest within a period of two months from the

date of receipt of the certified copy of this

Judgment.

4. Needless to observe that the claimant is

not entitled for the interest for delayed period.

5. The Registry to draw the modified award

accordingly.

6. Office is directed to transmit the original

records to the concerned Tribunal forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE TKN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter