Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Hemanth Kumar H S vs State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 10754 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10754 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Hemanth Kumar H S vs State Of Karnataka on 19 April, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                                -1-
                                                          NC: 2024:KHC:15435
                                                      WP No. 10196 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024

                                            BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 10196 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
                   BETWEEN:

                         SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR H.S.,
                         S/O SUBBEGOWDA H.,
                         AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
                         R/AT NO.243,
                         HUSKUR COLONY BUS STOP,
                         HUSKUR, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
                         BENGALURU - 562 123.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SMT. SHRIDEVI BHOSALE, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                         DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
Digitally signed         VIDHANA SOUDHA,
by NAGAVENI
                         BANGALORE - 560 001,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                 REP. BY SECRETARY.
KARNATAKA
                   2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT
                         MAGISTRATE,
                         BENGALURU DISTRICT,
                         KEMPEGOWDA ROAD,
                         BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVANA,
                         BENGALURU - 560 009.

                   3.    THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                         NELAMANGALA SUB DIVISION,
                                   -2-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:15435
                                              WP No. 10196 of 2024




     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 562 123.

4.   THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
     NELAMANGALA TOWN POLICE STATION,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 562 123.

5.   THE POLICE INSPECTOR,
     MADANAYAKANAHALLI POLICE STATION,
     BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
     BENGALURU - 562 123.
                                                     ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.P. YOGANNA, AGA)

     THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) QUASH THE
NOTICE DATED 23/03/2024, IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO.
M.A.G(4)/GADIPARU/CR/325/2023-24, ISSUED BY THE R2,
THEREBY CALLING UPON HIM TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY AN
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN UNDER SECTION 55 OF
KARNATAKA POLICE ACT, FOR EXTERNMENT OF THIS
PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                ORDER

The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following

prayers:

"i. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Notice dated 23.03.2024, in proceedings bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.325/2023-24, issued by the Respondent No.2, thereby calling upon him to show cause as to why an action should not be taken under Section 55 of the Karnataka Police Act, for externment of this Petitioner, vide ANNEXURE-'A' and;

NC: 2024:KHC:15435

ii. Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Proceedings in case bearing No.M.A.G.(4)/Gadiparu/C.R.No.325/2023-24, pending on the file of the Deputy Commissioner, Cum Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bengaluru District, vide ANNEXURE-'A', and;

iii. Grant all consequential orders, and;

iv. Pass such other order or orders as the case may be, in the interest of justice and equity."

2. Heard Smt. Shridevi Bhosale, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and Sri. K.P. Yoganna, learned AGA

appearing for the respondents and have perused the material

on record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that the issue in the lis stands answered by the

judgment rendered by this Court in W.P.No.392/2023 disposed

on 21.03.2024 in as much as the report that needs to be

appended to the notice is not appended to the notice seeking to

show cause as to why the petitioner should be not externed.

Therefore, there is violation not only of the act law laid down by

the Apex Court in the case of DEEPAK V. STATE OF

NC: 2024:KHC:15435

MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS1 as also the order passed by

this Court in W.P.No.392/2023.

4. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

i. The Writ Petition is allowed.

ii. The show cause notice dated 23.03.2024, which does not append the report stands quashed. iii. The matter is remitted back to the hands of the Competent Authority to redo the exercise, if situation warrants and regulate procedure strictly in consonance with the judgments of the Apex Court, this Court and the circular dated 18.04.2024, so also bearing in mind the observations made in the course of the order.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SJK

2022 SCC OnLine SC 99

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter