Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6252 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6937-DB
MFA No. 201090 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.201090 OF 2021 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
UNIVERSAL SOMPO
GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER,
2A, 2ND FLOOR, 84 RAMSON COMPLEX,
P.B.ROAD, HOSUR, HUBBALLI - 580 021
NOW BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI SUBHASH MALLAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
SWETA KULKARNI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 1. MENGA SUREKHA
KARNATAKA
W/O. LATE MENGA RAJKUMAR,
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD
2. MENGA SUDEEP KUMAR
S/O. LATE MENGA RAJKUMAR
AGE :17 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT
3. MENGA NILAMBIKA
D/O. LATE MENGA RAJKUMAR
AGE: 12 YEARS, OCCUPATION: STUDENT
(RESPONDENT NO.2 & RESPONDENT NO.3
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6937-DB
MFA No. 201090 of 2021
U/G OF THEIR MOTHER MENGA SUREKHA)
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO RESPONDENT NO.3 ARE
R/O. H.NO.3-104/55, GOUTHAM NAGAR,
PATANCHERU, MEDAK DIST.
TELANGANA STATE
NOW RESIDING AT DONGAPUR
TQ.BHALKI, DIST.BHALKI - 585 401.
4. SHIVARAJ S/O. SIDRAM MENGA
AGE: 74 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL
5. NAGAMMA W/O. SHIVARAJ MENGA
AGE: 69 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL,
RESPONDENT NO.4 TO RESPONDENT NO.5 ARE
R/O. DONGAPUR, TQ.BHALKI,
DIST.BIDAR - 585 401.
6. B. SRINIVAS REDDY S/O. B.RAM REDDY
AGE: MAJOR, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS,
R/O: FLAT NO.203, RV FORTUNE NEST ALKAPOOR
TOWNSHIP, NEAR SHIVALAYAM,
NEKNAMPURA PUPPALAGUDA,
K.V.RANGA REDDY, TELANGANA- 500 089.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI BABU H. METTAGUDDA, ADV. FOR R1, R4 & R5,
R2 & R3 ARE MINORS REPTD. BY R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL BY
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
31.03.2021, IN M.V.C.NO.238/2017 PASSED BY THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. MACT, BHALKI, IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6937-DB
MFA No. 201090 of 2021
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the Insurance Company, feeling
aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 31.03.2021
passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT,
Bhalki, at Bhalki in MVC No.238/2017.
2. The Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of
`36,34,933/- along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum
from the date of petition till its realisation, for the death of one
M. Rajkumar in a road traffic accident which took place on
06.03.2017 at about 3.30 a.m., when the driver of the car
bearing Reg.No.AP-12/M-9311 by name B. Ravichandra Reddy
lost control over the car and hit against the road side stone. In
the said accident, B. Ravichandra Reddy died on the spot and
M. Rajkumar sustained grievous injuries to his head and chest
and later succumbed to the injuries in the hospital.
3. The claimants are the wife, two minor children and
the parents of the deceased.
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6937-DB MFA No. 201090 of 2021
4. This appeal is preferred on the ground that the
deceased was an inmate of the car which is involved in the
accident and therefore, the insurer is not liable to pay any
compensation. Further, that the Tribunal did not deduct TDS
while computing the compensation under the annual income.
5. It is not in dispute that the car which was involved
in the accident was insured with the appellant herein and the
policy - Ex.R-1 was in force at the time of accident. The
learned counsel for the appellant has contended that there was
no premium collected for the inmates of the vehicle and
therefore, the deceased being an inmate, cannot be considered
as a third party. However, perusal of the policy - Ex. R-1
shows it is a private car package policy which is also not
disputed and therefore, the contention of the learned counsel
for the appellant cannot be accepted.
6. There are five claimants. Considering the sum
awarded towards loss of consortium, we find that the
compensation awarded to the claimants is not excessive.
Hence, there is no scope for reduction of compensation and
NC: 2023:KHC-K:6937-DB MFA No. 201090 of 2021
therefore, there is no merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed.
The amount in deposit before this Court shall be
transmitted to the Tribunal. Further, the Registry is directed to
send back the trial Court records forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SWK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!