Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7427 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:38554-DB
WA No. 1180 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1180 OF 2023 (L-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
GOPALA,
S/O LATE AKALAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/A CHINNENA HALLI,
SOMESHWARA POST,
PERESANDRA VIA GUDIBANDE TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. THIPPESWAMY J R., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. M C BASAVARAJU.,ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed AND:
by SHARADA
VANI B THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,
Location: HIGH KSRTC, CHIKKABALLAPURA DIVISION,
COURT OF CHIKKABALLAPURA 562 101.
KARNATAKA
...RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO i) SET ASIDE THE
ORDER OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JDUGE PASSED IN WP No.
51946/2016 DATED 19.03.2021 IN SO FAR AS DENIAL OF ONE
INCREMENT WITH CUMULATIVE EFFECT AND RECOVERY OF
ONE MONTH SALARY IS CONCERNED (MODIFICATION OF
PUNISHMENT ORDER DATED 29.09.2012) AND ii) GRANT SUCH
OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFs AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:38554-DB
WA No. 1180 of 2023
FIT TO GRANT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE
CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This intra-court appeal by the workman seeks to call
in question a learned Single Judge's order dated 19.3.2021
whereby, his W.P.No.51946/2016 (L-KSRTC) having been
favoured, the disciplinary penalty has been reduced i.e.,
the withholding of two annual increments with cumulative
effect has been scaled down to withholding of one single
increment and the direction for the recovery of one month
salary has also been set at naught.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant argues that
the learned Single Judge has erred in not quashing the
penalty order in its entirety, regard being had to the fact
matrix of the case and therefore, our indulgence is
eminently warranted. However, we are not convinced of
this submission inasmuch as the guilt is proved and
whatever penalty imposed by the Disciplinary Authority
NC: 2023:KHC:38554-DB WA No. 1180 of 2023
has been rightly scaled down as discussed above.
Ordinarily, what penalty should be awarded lies in the
domain of the employer. However, in the fitness of things,
learned Single Judge has granted reprieve in his
discretion. Such orders do not merit interference in
appeal. Added, such an appeal is not maintainable in the
light of a Seven Judge's Bench decision in TAMMANNA
vs. RENUKA, 2009 SCC OnLine Kar 123.
In view of the above, the appeal being devoid of
merits, is liable to be & accordingly dismissed, costs
having been made easy.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
cbc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!