Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7491 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:38880
WP No. 24115 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 24115 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
CAPT. SACHIN THOMAS,
S/O THOMAS M.T,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
R/AT MAMMOOTTIL HOUSE,
NILAMBUR R.S, P.O NILAMBUR,
MALLAPURAM, KERALA - 679 330.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ABHIMANYU DEVAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
Digitally signed OPPOSITE SAFDURJUNG AIRPORT,
by PADMAVATHI
BK NEW DELHI - 110 003.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 2. AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED,
(SINCE AIR ASIA (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED IS
MERGED INTO AIR INDIA EXPRESS LIMITED)
CIN: U62100HR1971PLC113015,
HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
BLOCK 4, YATIKA ONE-ON-ONE, SECTOR 16, NH 48,
GURUGRAM - 122 007, HARYANA.
EMAIL [email protected]
...RESPONDENTS
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:38880
WP No. 24115 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1
TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 4.10.2023
MARKED AS ANNEXURE-G AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner, a pilot, who enters into an agreement with
Air Asia (India) Private Limited, airline run by respondent No.2.
He has knocked at the doors of this Court seeking issuance of a
writ in the nature of Mandamus to consider the representation
submitted to respondent No.1 - Director General of Civil
Aviation.
2. A perusal at the representation would indicate that
he has several grievances qua respondent No.2. The
agreement entered into is between the petitioner and
respondent No.2, the Director General of Civil Aviation has
nothing to do with the problems between the petitioner and
respondent No.2 or the erstwhile entity of respondent No.2 -
Air Asia. Since respondent No.2 is not a State under Article 12
of the Constitution of India, the writ petition in the form that it
is presented would not be entertainable.
NC: 2023:KHC:38880 WP No. 24115 of 2023
3. The issue in the lis stands answered by the Apex
Court in the case of FEDERAL BANK LTD., Vs. SAGAR
THOMAS AND OTHERS1.
In the light of the said judgment, the petition is disposed
as not entertainable, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail
of such remedy, as is available in law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
JY
CT: BHK
2003 10 SCC 733
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!