Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2688 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 1896 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1896 OF 2019 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
Sri. Honnayya
Aged About 40 Years,
S/O Gopala Jogi,
Door No.5-101,
Padushedde Village,
Post: Bondel - 575 008
Mangaluru, D.K.District.
...Appellant
(By Sri. Sangamesh for Sri. Chandranath Ariga K., Advocate)
And:
Sri Uggappa Shetty
Aged about 78 years,
S/O. Late. K. Narayana Shetty,
Digitally signed
"Aachemane" House,
by BANGALORE Marakada Village,
MADHAVACHAR
VEENA Post: Kumjathbail - 575 015,
Location: High
Court of Mangaluru, D.K. District.
Karnataka
...Respondent
(By Sri. Sachin B S.,Advocate)
***
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to call for the records in
O.S.No.98/2015 on the file of the III Addl.Senior Civil Judge and
JMFC at Mangaluru; set aside the judgment and decree dated
24.04.2019 passed by the III Addl.Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at
Mangaluru, in O.S.No.98/2015; dismiss the suit in O.S.No.98/2015
on the file of the III Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Mangaluru;
-2-
RFA No. 1896 of 2019
and allow this appeal and grant such other reliefs as this Court deem
fit to grant in the interest of justice and equity.
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders through
Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing, this day, the Court made the
following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant, who is physically
present in the Court, submits that despite his best efforts
and communication with the appellant, the appellant is not
properly assisting him in complying the office objections,
including the payment of deficit Court fee. With this, he
pleads his helplessness to comply the office objections.
2. A perusal of the order sheet would go to show that
in this appeal of the year 2019, sufficient opportunities
have already been granted to the appellant to comply the
office objections. On 02-07-2021 also, at the request of
the learned counsel for the appellant, two weeks' time was
granted to enable the learned counsel to comply the office
objections. Despite the same, the appellant is not
evincing any interest in complying the office objections, in
which regard, learned counsel for the appellant has
pleaded his helplessness in the matter. As such, I do not
RFA No. 1896 of 2019
find any reason to grant further time in this appeal of the
year 2019.
Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed for
non-compliance of office objections, as well as for
non-prosecution.
That the cost of a sum of `500/- ordered on the date
22-05-2023 since has not been paid, the beneficiary of the
said cost which is the Legal Services Committee of this
Court is entitled to recover the said amount by treating
the order dated 22-05-2023 and today's order as a decree
and as arrears of land revenue, in accordance with law.
Registry to transmit a copy of the order dated
22-05-2023 as well as today's order to the said
beneficiary, i.e. the Legal Services Committee of this
Court, for their needful.
Sd/-
JUDGE BMV*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!