Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1813 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 552 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 552 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. MISS. VEDAVATHI
D/O LATE C. NAGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
OCCUPATION : NILL
R/AT MINAKINGURAKI VILLAGE,
MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI,
GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK-561 208
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
2. SMT. JAYAMMA
W/O LATE C. NAGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:NILL,
R/AT MINAKINGURAKI VILLAGE,
MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK-561 208
Location: HIGH CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT
COURT OF ...APPELLANTS
KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. VENKATESH N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. SMT. UMA
D/O LATE C. NAGAPPA,
W/O BALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:NIL
R/AT MINAKINGURAKI VILLAGE,
MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI,
-2-
RSA No. 552 of 2017
GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK
PIN-561 208
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
2. SMT. SHANTHAMMA
D/O LATE C NAGAPPA,
W/O NAGARAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
OCCUPATION:NIL
R/AT MINAKINGURAKI VILLAGE,
MANCHENAHALLI HOBLI,
GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK
PIN - 561 208
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.01.2017 PASSED IN
RA NO.31/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC., GOWRIBIDANUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL
AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
15.06.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.232/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GAURIBIDANUR.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal was filed in the year 2017. The learned
counsel for the appellants is not pursuing the matter. Hence,
this Court on 27.02.2023, taken note of the fact that the appeal
is of the year 2017 and the matter is still pending for
consideration and also the learned counsel for the appellants is
not interested in pursuing the matter diligently. However, in the
interest of justice one more opportunity is given to the learned
RSA No. 552 of 2017
counsel for the appellants to prosecute the matter and also it is
made clear that if the learned counsel for the appellants does
not appear on the next date of hearing, the appeal will be
dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. In spite of an opportunity is given to the learned
counsel for the appellants; he is not pursuing the matter from
the year 2017. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
3. In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.1/2017
for stay does not survive for consideration, the same stands
disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!