Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3810 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:22362
RFA No. 2052 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2052 OF 2011 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. P.S. KRISHNAVENI
W/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
NO.30, 4TH CROSS, HANUMANTHANAGAR
BANGALORE-560004
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A N GANGADHARAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. P.S. BADARINARAYANA MURTHY
S/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
Digitally signed NO.137, 5TH MAIN ROAD
by GAYATHRI BUILDING, CHAMRARAJAPET,
DHANALAKSHMI
MURTHY BANGALORE-560018
Location: High
Court of 2. SRI. P.S. SRIRAMULU
Karnataka S/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
(DIED)
3 SRI P S ANANTHA PADMANABHA
S/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT NO.30, 4TH CROSS,
HANUMANTANAGAR
BANGALORE-560004
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:22362
RFA No. 2052 of 2011
4. SMT P S JAYANTHI
D/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HER LR'S
4(A) B. N. BHADRINATH
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
H/O LATE JAYANTHI
4(B) KUM. HARSHITA
D/O B.N. BADRINATH
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS
4(C) KUM. SUPRIYA
D/O B.N. BADRINATH
AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT No.942
12TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, HANUMANTHANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 019.
5. P S PANDU RANGA
S/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
R./AT 11/B, 50 FEET ROAD HANUMANTANAGAR
BANGALORE-560004
6. SMT P S VASAVAMBA
W/O RADHAKRISHNA
D/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
SHOP NO.1, ULSOOR MARKET
BANGALORE-5600081
7. SMT P R BHARGAVI
D/O P S PANDURANGA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
8. SMT P R BHARATHI
D/O P S PANDURANGA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:22362
RFA No. 2052 of 2011
RESPONDENT Nos. 7 AND 8 ARE
R/AT 11/B, 50 FEET ROAD HANUMANTHANAGAR
BANGALORE-560004
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. D R P BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R1
R2 DEAD
NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DT. 20.07.2015
NOTIC TO 4(A) TO (C) SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED
HARISH GANAPATHI M.L., ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R8)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S.96 READ WITH ORDER XLIII,
RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
16.08.2011 PASSED IN O.S.2299/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE
I-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE,
PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 04.11.2022, stating that the matter has been
settled between the parties before the trial Court in FDP
No.8/2012.
2. Memo dated 04.11.2022 is taken on record. The
appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
NC: 2023:KHC:22362 RFA No. 2052 of 2011
3. Office is directed to send back the original records
to the trial Court, forthwith.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!