Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3045 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:19440
WP No. 24429 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 24429 OF 2022 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
1. MRS. DIVYA GANESH NALLUR,
W/O MR. GANESH NALLUR SHIVU,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.36, 6TH MAIN RAOD,
TATANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 092.
2. MR. GANESH NALLUR SHIVU,
S/O MR. SHIVU N.S,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.36, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
TATANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 092.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA H S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed NIL
by CHETAN B
C ...RESPONDENT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
KARNATAKA THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEXURE-A DATED 15.10.2022
PASSED BY THE III ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT,
BANGALORE IN MC NO.3330/2021 AND ALLOW THE
M.C.PETITION BEARING M.C.NO. 3330/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-
D BY DISSOLVING THE MARRIAGE SOLEMNIZED BETWEEN THE
PETITIONERS ON 27.05.2001 AND REGISTERED ON
11.06.2001, BY GRANTING A DECREE OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL
CONSENT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:19440
WP No. 24429 of 2022
ORDER
Petitioners being the estranged couple, had moved a
Petition for decree of dissolution of their marriage on the
basis of mutual consent. In support of that, certain
grounds are urged. The matter having been sent to
Mediation, a report dated 2.1.2023 was furnished to the
court reporting settlement. Parties had moved a
Compromise Petition too, in terms of settlement arrived at
before the conciliator. However, learned Judge of the
Family Court, Bengaluru, has negatived the claim for grant
of dissolution of marriage on the sole ground that the
spouses are residing under the same roof.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners
finds fault with the impugned order contending that in
matters like this, the fact that the parties are residing
under the same roof, pales into insignificance except for
the purpose of territorial jurisdiction. The fact that the
spouses are residing in the same premises could not have
been a ground for making the order of the kind. Such a
NC: 2023:KHC:19440 WP No. 24429 of 2022
flawed reasoning bewilders the Court, to say the least.
Such a fact arguably may show the good culture of the
spouses who are otherwise at loggerheads. The reason
assigned by the Court below for denying relief to the
parties constitutes an error of great magnitude apparent
on the face of the record.
In view of the above, this Petition succeeds; a Writ of
Certiorari issues quashing the impugned order; matter is
remitted to the portals of the learned Judge of the Court
below, requesting him to pass a judgment & decree in
terms of the Compromise Petition and the report of the
Mediator. This is to be done at the earliest.
Parties are directed to appear before the
jurisdictional Family Court, Bengaluru on 23.6.2023.
Costs made easy.
Sd/-
JUDGE cbc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!