Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 898 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH
R.S.A.NO.840/2018 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
SRI GOPALAGOWDA
SON OF LATE CHANNEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT ARALIMARADAKOPPALU
VILLAGE, BETTADAPURA HOBLI
PERIYAPATNA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
PIN-571 102. ... APPELLANT
[BY SRI P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE]
AND:
1. C.M. MALLAIAH
SON OF MADAIAH
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DOOR NO.159,
SHIKSHAKARA BADAVANE
VIVEKANANDA BLOCK
YARAGANAHALLI
MYSURU-570 011.
2. MAHENDRA
SON OF LATE RAJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BASAVESHWARA COLONY
BETTADAPURA VILLAGE
BETTADAPURA HOBLI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK
2
MYSURU DISTRICT
PIN-571 102.
3. GIRIYA
SON OF LATE RAJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BASAVESHWARA COLONY
BETTADAPURA VILLAGE
BETTADAPURA HOBLI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
PIN-571 102.
4. SMT. NAGAMANI
DAUGHTER OF LATE RAJEGOWDA
WIFE OF SWAMYGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
RESIDING AT MURDUR VILLAGE
SALIGRAMA HOBLI
K.R. NAGARA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
PIN-571 604.
5. SMT. VISHALAKSHI
DAUGHTER OF LATE RAJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
RESIDING AT SALIGRAMA VILLAGE
SALIGRAMA HOBLI,
K.R.NAGARA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT
PIN-571 604.
6. SMT. KAVERAMMA
WIFE OF LATE RAJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BASAVESHWARA
COLONY, BETTADAPURA VILLAGE
BETTADAPURA HOBLI,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK
MYSURU DISTRICT-571 102.
3
7. SMT. H.R. PARVATHAMMA
WIFE OF C.M. MALLAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DOOR NO.159,
SHIKSHAKARA BADAVANE
VIVEKANANDA BLOCK
YARAGANAHALLI
MYSURU-570 011. ... RESPONDENTS
THIS R.S.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2018
PASSED IN R.A.NO.26/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC., PERIYAPATNA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL
AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
13.04.2016 PASSED IN OS.NO.146/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PERIYAPATNA.
THIS R.S.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court, vide order dated 23.10.2021, granted two
weeks' time to comply with the office objections, failing which,
list this matter for dismissal. Even though, two weeks' time was
granted on 23.10.2021, the office objections are not complied
with.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!