Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 572 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
-1-
CRL.RP No. 1032 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1032 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
MUTHOOT FINANCE LIMITED
HEAD OFFICE AT COCHIN OF KERALA STATE,
INTER ALIA BRANCH OFFICE AT
SAUNDATTI BRANCH, CTS NO.778 & 779,
OLD BUS STAND ROAD,
SAUNDATTI,
BELGAUM-591126
BRANCH MANAGER AND
Digitally POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
signed by
SUMA MR. KIRAN RAMACHANDRA BATTENNAWAR
Location: AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BARKE P.S. MANGALORE
D.K., REP. BY SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
BENGALURU.
2. MR GIRISH PRABHU
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
S/O LATE SRIKARA PRABHU
R/AT G-1, SHARAVATHI APARTMENT,
M.G. ROAD, 3RD CROSS
-2-
CRL.RP No. 1032 of 2018
KODIAL GUTTU EAST
MANGALORE-575 003.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KRISHNA KUMAR K.K. HCGP FOR R1;
R2-SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ALLOW THE
REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 24.07.2018, IN UNNUMBERED APPEAL ON THE
FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MANGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This revision petition is filed challenging the order
dated 24.07.2018 passed by the Principal District Judge,
Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in unnumbered criminal
appeal.
2. A Criminal Case in C.C.No.13/2015 was
registered for trial of the accused for the offences
punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of IPC. The trial
court acquitted the accused by its Judgment dated
10.07.2017. It directed interim custody of M.O-1 in favour
CRL.RP No. 1032 of 2018
of the complainant/PW-1. This order of the trial court
handing over custody of M.O-1 to the complainant was
challenged by the petitioner in a belated criminal appeal
before the Sessions Court. An application filed for
condonation of delay was considered and rejected by the
Sessions Court on the ground that the petitioner was
negligent and not bonafide in filing a belated appeal.
Being aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition
is filed.
3. Notice of the petition was served to the
respondent No.2 herein who was the complainant.
However he has not entered appearance. Be that as it
may, delay of 45 days was occasioned due to the reasons
mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the application
for delay, which is reasonable and probable and deserves
to be accepted. The Sessions Court ought to have been
liberal in considering the question of condonation of delay.
CRL.RP No. 1032 of 2018
This court therefore finds it appropriate to condone the
delay in filing the appeal before the Sessions Court.
4. Consequently, this Revision Petition is allowed
and the impugned order dated 24.07.2018 passed by
Sessions Court in unnumbered criminal appeal is set aside.
The case is remitted back to the Sessions Court which
shall consider the unnumbered appeal in accordance with
law and dispose it of in accordance with law, after hearing
the respondent No.2.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SBN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!