Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Latheesh Kumar T vs The Assistant Commissioner
2023 Latest Caselaw 1160 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1160 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Sri. Latheesh Kumar T vs The Assistant Commissioner on 2 February, 2023
Bench: R Devdas
                                         -1-
                                                 WP No. 2423 of 2023




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                      BEFORE

                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

                       WRIT PETITION NO. 2423 OF 2023 (LR)

             BETWEEN:

             SRI. LATHEESH KUMAR T
             S/O LAKSHMANAN T.,
             AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
             AGRICULTURIST,
             R/AT BINDU BHAVAN,
             KAKKARETHOTTADA,
             KANNUR - 670 007. KERALA STATE,
             REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER,
             MR. ANEESH KUMAR T.,
             S/O LAKSHMANAN T.,
             AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
             R/AT THAYYIL HOUSE,
             KAKKARETHOTTADA,
             KANNUR - 670 007, KERALA STATE.
Digitally                                               ...PETITIONER
signed by
JUANITA      (BY SRI. RAM. M.K. ADVOCATE FOR
THEJESWINI
                 SRI.DESHRAJ, ADVOCATE)
Location:
HIGH COURT   AND:
OF
KARNATAKA
             1.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                   MANDYA SUB-DIVISION,
                   MANDYA - 571 401.

             2.    TAHSILDAR,
                   MALAVALLI TALUK, MALAVALLI,
                   MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430.
                                                     ...RESPONDENTS
             (BY SRI.SESHU V. HCGP)
                              -2-
                                      WP No. 2423 of 2023




      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER     DATED    08/11/2016    PASSED   BY   R-1   IN
L.R.F.NO.247/2013-14 WITH RESPECT OF THE LANDS BEARING
SY NOS. 139/4 MEASURING 26 GUNTAS SY.NO.140
MEASURING 03 GUNTAS AND SY.NO.141 MEASURING 1.12
GUNTAS, ALL ARE SITUATED AT LINGANNAPURA VILLAGE,
KASABAHOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT (VIDE
ANNEXURES-F AND G) AND ETC.,

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRILIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                            ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice

for both the respondents.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of

forfeiture dated 08.11.2016 at Annexures-F and G passed

by the Assistant Commissioner, Mandya Sub-Division,

Mandya, under the provisions of Section 83 for violation of

the provisions contained in Sections 79-A and 79-B of the

Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that

this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has

been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice

WP No. 2423 of 2023

to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar

circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021

remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner

for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of

hearing to the aggrieved person.

4. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land

Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings

were pending before any court/authority.

5. Learned High Court Government Pleader points

out from the impugned order that notice was indeed

issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been

issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant

Commissioner.

6. It is the contention of the learned High Court

Government Pleader that even as per the materials

available on record, after forfeiture, the excess lands have

been granted by the State Government to third parties.

The Assistant Commissioner is therefore required to

WP No. 2423 of 2023

ascertain, whether the forfeited lands still remain with the

State Government or has been granted to third parties. If

the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-

section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to

say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or

otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending

Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared

as abated by the Assistant Commissioner.

7. Having considered the submission of the learned

Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate

Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts

and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar

and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co-

ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein.

8. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. The

impugned order dated 08.11.2016 passed in case

No.L.R.F.:247/2013-14 is hereby quashed and set aside.

The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant

Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner

WP No. 2423 of 2023

including the consequences of the subsequent amendment

brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the

Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment

No.56 of 2020.

9. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-

Assistant Commissioner on 24th February 2023, without

waiting for further notice from the Assistant

Commissioner.

Ordered accordingly.

10. Learned High Court Government Pleader is

permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of

four weeks from today.

Sd/-

JUDGE

rv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter