Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Satyanarayana Muniyappa vs Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd
2023 Latest Caselaw 9211 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9211 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri Satyanarayana Muniyappa vs Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd on 4 December, 2023

Author: K.Somashekar

Bench: K.Somashekar

                                                 -1-
                                                          NC: 2023:KHC:43690-DB
                                                         COMAP No. 261 of 2023




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                              PRESENT

                               THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR

                                                 AND

                                THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                                COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2023

                      BETWEEN:

                            SRI. SATYANARAYANA MUNIYAPPA,
                            SOLE PROPRIETOR,
                            AGE 54 YEARS,
                            M/S RAHUL INDUSTRIES,
                            NO.A-18, HMT INDUSTRIES ESTATE,
                            JALAHALLI, BENGALURU (URBAN)-560 013.
                            ALSO AT:-
                            NO.836, 7TH CROSS, BAHUBALINAGAR,
                            JALAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU NORTH,
                            BENGALURU-560 013.
                            ALSO AT:
Digitally signed by
VINUTHA M
                            NO.255, 1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS,
Location: HIGH              KAMMAGONDANAHALLI, VISHWESHWARAIAH
COURT OF                    LAYOUT ABBIGERE, JALAHALLI WEST,
KARNATAKA
                            BENGALURU-560 015.
                                                                     ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. PREMNATH T.N, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))

                      AND:

                      1.    SIEMENS FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD.,
                            A NON-BANKING FINANCIAL COMPANY
                            DULY REGISTERED WITH RESERVE BANK
                            OF INDIA AND INCORPORATED UNDER THE
                            PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956.

                            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
                            PLOT NO.2, SECTOR 2, KHARGHAR NODE,
                               -2-
                                        NC: 2023:KHC:43690-DB
                                       COMAP No. 261 of 2023




     NAVI, MUMBAI 410 210, MAHARASHTRA
     INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED
     SIGNATORY MR. VAIBHAV PRIYADARSHINI.

2.   MRS. GAYATHRI,
     GUARANTOR,
     AGE 37 YEARS,
     NO.836, 7TH CROSS, BAHUBALLINAGAR,
     JALAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU NORTH,
     BENGALURU-560 013.
     ALSO AT:-
     NO.255, 1ST FLOOR, 7TH CROSS,
     KAMMAGONDANAHALLI,
     VISHWESHWARAIAH LAYOUT,
     ABBIGERE, JALAHALLI WEST,
     BENGALURU-560 015.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS

     THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC,
PRAYING    TO   A)   CALL   FOR    THE   RECORDS     IN
COM.EX.NO.120/2023 (CCH-87) LXXXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU AND SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDRE DATED 13/06/2023 PASSED BY THE C/c
LXXXVI ACC AND SJ BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-A, PASSED
BY THE TRIAL COURT IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY HYPOTHECATED ASSETS STATED IN THE IMPUGNED
ORDER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
K.SOMASHEKAR, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                          JUDGMENT

Sri T.N.Premnath, learned counsel for the appellant is on

record, but there is no representation either through video

conferencing or present before the Court physically.

2. Under this appeal, the appellant is challenging the

impugned order dated 13.06.2023 passed by the Executing

Court in Com.Ex.No.120/2023.

NC: 2023:KHC:43690-DB

3. Office noting reveals non-compliance of office

objections for sixth time.

4. Neither the counsel nor the party to the

proceedings come forwarded to proceed in accordance with law

to cure the defects under the curial law even though the matter

is listed for compliance for the sixth time.

5. The first limb of the provisions of Section 151 of

CPC is nothing limit to exercise inherent power that is neither

affecting nor effecting any order under this Code, the second

limb is to prevent the abuse of process of law and the third

limb of the said provisions, or otherwise to secure the ends of

justice, it is applicable to both the parties.

6. Therefore, keeping in view the scope of Section 151

of CPC, it is deemed appropriate to state that this appeal is

dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

VM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter