Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9197 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:8966
MFA No. 200879 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL
MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200879 OF 2018 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SURESH
S/O VISWANATH SAJJANSHETTY,
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: LINEMAN,
R/O 70, KEB COLONY, SANTAPOOR,
TQ. AURAD, DIST. BIDAR.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANJEEV PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. CHANDRAKANTHA
Digitally signed W/O KASHAPPA MULAGE,
by LUCYGRACE
AGE: 39 YEARS,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF OCC: DRIVER AND AGRICULTURE,
KARNATAKA R/O CHIKEPT, BIDAR TQ. & DIST.
2. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
2ND FLOOR, OPP: NEHARU STADIUM,
(SAI SCHOOL) BIDAR, BIDAR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENTS
(SRI. MOHAMMAD ABDUL QUAYUM, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
R1 - SERVED)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-K:8966
MFA No. 200879 of 2018
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED 23.08.2017 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T., AURAD-B IN MVC
NO.317/2014, BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT
FROM RS.2,22,777/- TO RS.14,00,000/- AND ALSO ENHANCE
THE INTEREST PAYABLE BY THE RESPONDENTS ON THE
COMPENSATION AMOUNT AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO
ALLOW THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT HEREIN.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
A memo dated 31.10.2023 is filed by the learned
counsel for respondent No.2 - Insurance Company along
with copy of the order dated 03.07.2023 passed in MFA
No.200255/2018 which was filed by the respondent -
Insurance Company against the judgment and award
dated 23.08.2017 passed in MVC No.317/2014 on the file
of MACT-IX and Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Aurad-B.
2. The said appeal was preferred by the Insurance
Company questioning the extent of liability.
3. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court considering
the contentions urged by the Insurance Company as well
NC: 2023:KHC-K:8966
as the claimant, who was arrayed as respondent No.1
therein has re-determined the compensation, by which the
compensation that was awarded by the Tribunal in a sum
of Rs.2,22,777/- has been reduced to Rs.1,59,577/-.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant/claimant has
not disputed the position of this Court considering the
claim of both the Insurance Company as well as of the
claimant in the said order.
5. In that view of the matter, the present appeal
filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of
compensation does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
LG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!