Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11276 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:46458
CRL.A No. 1048 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1048 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
B.A. MURUGESH,
SON OF B.G. ANJANEYA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
BUSINESSMAN, NO.2516/1,
8TH MAIN ROAD, MCC 'A' BLOCK,
DAVANAGERE-577 005.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
DIVYA MEDICALS,
OWNER OF K. SHIVAKUMAR,
SON OF KALLAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
BUSINESSMAN, 8TH MAIN, NEAR MG LAB,
CHIKKAMANNI DEVARAJ URS EXTENSION,
BEHIND KEB GRID, DAVANAGERE-577 005.
...RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
SOWMYA D (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
Location: THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET
High Court ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 11.01.2019, PASSED
of
Karnataka BY THE LEARNED III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND VII
ADDITIONAL MACT AT, DAVANAGERE IN C.C.NO.900/2017,
ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT.
I.A.NO.2/2019 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO GRANT LEAVE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS ALONG WITH THE
I.A.2/2019 THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:46458
CRL.A No. 1048 of 2019
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for appellant is called out.
Absent.
2. Regularly there is no representation on behalf
of the appellant.
3. The complainant has filed a complaint against
the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138
of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The cheque was for a
sum of Rs.2,70,000/-. However, in the cross-examination,
the complainant admitted that the cheque includes the
interest portion also. The complainant is not entitled to
claim any interest and his cross-examination reveals that
he has charged interest at the rate of 2%. He is not a
money lender and no license is there for money lending.
4. Considering, these lacunas and considering the
fact that the cheque amount is not a legally enforceable
debt as it includes the exorbitant interest portion, the
learned Magistrate has held that there is no legally
enforceable liability under the cheque.
NC: 2023:KHC:46458
5. The learned counsel for appellant did not
appear before the Court so as to convince the Court
regarding I.A.No.2/2019. Considering these aspects, no
grounds are forthcoming for allowing I.A.No.2/2019 by
granting leave to file appeal. Hence, I.A.No.2/2019 stands
dismissed. Consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!