Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S.Pratap Electronics vs M/S.Commission And General Agency
2023 Latest Caselaw 10727 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10727 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

M/S.Pratap Electronics vs M/S.Commission And General Agency on 15 December, 2023

                                         -1-
                                                    NC: 2023:KHC:46054
                                                   RFA No. 306 of 2010




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                  DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                      BEFORE
                     THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANIL B KATTI
                  REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 306 OF 2010 (MON)
             BETWEEN:

             1.    M/S.PRATAP ELECTRONICS
                   A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM
                   HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.32/2, 5TH MAIN ROAD
                   CHAMARAJAPET, BANGALORE 560018
                   BY ITS PARTNER SRI N.PRATAP KUMAR

             2.    SRI N.PRATAP KUMAR
                   AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
                   S/O SRI D.NANJAPPA
                   NO.32/2, 5TH MAIN ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET,
                   BANGALORE- 560 018
                                                     ...APPELLANTS
             (BY SRI.BHEEMAPPA P.BANDIVADDAR, ADVOCATE FOR
                 SRI.B.N.JAYADEVAPPA, ADVOCATE)

Digitally    AND:
signed by
SUMITHRA R
                   M/S.COMMISSION AND GENERAL AGENCY
Location:
HIGH COURT         A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED
OF                 UNDER THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT,
KARNATAKA          CARRYING ON ITS BUSINESS AT NO.43,
                   J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE 2,
                   BY ITS PARTNER SRI M.K.GOPALASWAMY
                                                        ...RESPONDENT
             (BY SRI. B.SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

                  THIS RFA FILED U/O 41, R-1 R/W S-96 OF CPC AGAINST
             THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:06.10.2009 PASSED IN
             OS.5333/1992 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXI-ADDL. CITY CIVIL
             JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR
             RECOVERY OF MONEY.
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2023:KHC:46054
                                           RFA No. 306 of 2010




    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                         JUDGMENT

Sri Bheemappa P Bandivaddar, Advocate representing

Sri B N Jayadevappa, learned counsel for the appellant and

Sri B Sharat Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent

are present.

2. The suit of plaintiff/respondent came to be decreed

directing the defendants/appellants to pay an amount of

Rs.2,66,764/- to the plaintiff together with interest at 20%

p.a. till the date of filing the suit and at the rate of 6%

p.a. from the date of suit till the entire realization of

amount.

3. Appellants/defendant Nos.1 and 2 with counsel

and respondent/plaintiff with counsel referred above are

present.

4. Compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of

CPC is filed. It is now reported that the matter is settled

between appellants/defendants 1 and 2 and

NC: 2023:KHC:46054

plaintiff/respondent for a sum of Rs.3,25,000/-.

Defendant Nos.3 and 4 were placed exparte in the Trial

Court and they are not parties to the present appeal.

Appellants have already deposited a sum of Rs.1,33,400/-

on 13.01.2015 through demand draft No.185592 dated

12.1.2015 issued by Canara Bank, Koramangala Layout

Branch, Bengaluru and demand draft for Rs.1,91,600/-

issued by Canara Bank, Koramangala layout Branch,

Bengaluru dated 13.12.2023 is delivered today to

respondent/plaintiff M.K.Gopalaswamy representing M/s.

Commission and General Agency. Thus,

respondent/plaintiff admits acknowledgement of a total

sum of Rs.3,25,000/-.

5. On enquiry, the Court is satisfied that the parties

have arrived at a settlement for the amount stated in the

compromise petition on their own wish and will. Hence,

proceed to pass the following :

NC: 2023:KHC:46054

ORDER

The joint compromise petition filed under Order XXIII

Rule 3 of CPC with signature of parties and counsel is

accepted.

The appeal is ordered to be disposed of in terms of

the compromise petition.

The respondent/plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the

amount in deposit before this Court of Rs.1,33,400/- and

office is directed to pay the same with due identification

and proper acknowledgement.

Court fee paid by appellants/defendants No.1 and 2 is

ordered to be refunded in accordance with law.

Draw decree in terms of Compromise Petition.

SD/-

JUDGE

rs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter