Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharmegowda vs The Manager
2023 Latest Caselaw 10348 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10348 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Dharmegowda vs The Manager on 13 December, 2023

                                                  -1-
                                                            NC: 2023:KHC:45385
                                                        MFA No. 1833 of 2016




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                             BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1833 OF 2016(MV-I)
                   BETWEEN:

                   DHARMEGOWDA,
                   S/O SIDDEGOWDA
                   AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
                   R/O. HAREBEEHALLI VILLAGE,
                   HALEBEDU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK
                   HASSAN DISTRICT-577101.
                   PRESENTLY RESIDING AT:
                   C/O NAGARAJ, ALADAHALLI VILLAGE,
                   SALAGAME HOBLI,
                   HASSAN TALUK & DISTRICT-573201.
                                                                  ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
                   1.    THE MANAGER
Digitally signed
                         AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
by VINUTHA B S           IN FRONT OF VIDYANAGARA POLICE STATION,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                         VIDYANAGARA,1ST FLOOR,
                         CENTRAL BUILDING
                         HUBBALLI-580021.
                         REPRESENTED BY:
                         THE REGIONAL MANAGER,
                         BHARATHI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD.,
                         BHARATHI AXA VILLAGE,
                         DODDENAKUNDI VILLAGE,
                         K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE-560037.
                   2.    MAHESH
                         S/O MANJASHETTY,
                         AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
                         R/AT : HAGARE VILLAGE,
                               -2-
                                            NC: 2023:KHC:45385
                                      MFA No. 1833 of 2016




    MADIHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK
    HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H.C. VRUSHABENDRAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. A.N. KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED 14/12/2016,
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
     THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.10.2015       PASSED IN
MVC NO.2030/14 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE & ADDITIONAL MACT, HASSAN,
PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION
AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PART HEARD IN
HEARING MATTERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                        JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.Girish.B.Baladare, learned counsel for the

appellant. Also heard Sri.H.C.Vrushabendraiah, learned

counsel who represents Sri.A.N.Krishna Swamy, learned

counsel on record for respondent No.1. Issuance of notice

to respondent No.2 was dispensed with.

2. Challenging the sum that is awarded as

compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Hassan through orders in MVC No.2030/2014 dated

14.10.2015, the present appeal is preferred by the

NC: 2023:KHC:45385

claimant. The appellant seeks enhancement of

compensation.

3. Making his submission with regard to the merits

of the matter, learned counsel for the appellant states that

the appellant was doing agriculture and was also doing

milk vending business by the date of accident and was

earning considerable amount. Learned counsel submits

that the Tribunal however has taken a nominal sum of

Rs.5,000/- p.m. as earnings of the appellant which is

unjustifiable. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states

that a marginal increase may be made.

4. Gone through the contents of the impugned

order. The accident occurred in the year 2014. Therefore,

taking into consideration the occupation of the appellant

the Tribunal ought to have taken the income as Rs.8,500/-

p.m. which comes to Rs.1,02,000/- p.a. In case the annual

income of the appellant is taken as Rs.1,02,000/-,

applying 15% as the functional disability to whole body as

applied by the Tribunal and applying 14 as multiplier, loss

NC: 2023:KHC:45385

of future earnings due to disability comes to Rs.2,14,200/-

(Rs.8,500X12X15%X14). Also having regard to the nature

of injuries sustained which includes grievous injuries and

period of hospitalization as deposed by Pw.2, the appellant

would have taken bed rest atleast for a period of 4

months. Therefore, loss of income during laid up period

comes to Rs.34,000/-. Also the Tribunal failed to award

any amount towards loss of amenities in life. Having

regard to the material produced by way of evidence, this

Court is of the view that an amount of Rs.10,000/- is

required to be awarded as compensation towards loss of

amenities in life. Thus this Court is of the view that the

appellant is entitled to a compensation which can be

termed to just and reasonable under following heads:

                 Description              Amount
    Sl.
    No
     1    Compensation for Pain
                                           Rs.50,000
          and sufferings
     2    Medical expenditure to
                                           Rs.38,954
          the extent proved
     3    Future medical expenses            Rs.2,000
     4    Loss of earnings during
                                           Rs.34,000
          laid up period

                                                  NC: 2023:KHC:45385





         5        Loss of future earnings
                                                  Rs.2,14,200
                  due to disability
         6        Extra nourishment, diet,
                  conveyance              and       Rs.6,000/-
                  attendant charges
         7        Loss of amenities in life       Rs.10,000/-
                 Total Compensation              Rs.3,55,154

         5.       Hence, the following:

                                  ORDER

         (i)      Appeal is allowed in part.

         (ii)     The    compensation     awarded     by    Motor
         Accidents       Claims   Tribunal,     Hassan     through

orders in MVC No.2030/2014 dated 14.10.2015 is enhanced from Rs.2,33,287/- to Rs.3,55,154/-.

(iii) The enhanced amount shall carry interest at the same rate as awarded by the Tribunal, payable from the date of petition to date of deposit.

(iv) The order of the Tribunal in all other aspects holds good.

Sd/-

JUDGE NS CT:TSM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter