Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10175 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44803
MFA No. 6515 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6515 OF 2021 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT SAIPRIYA
W/O V VENKATESH
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO 24, 9TH CROSS
THIMMAIAH GARDEN, R T NAGAR POST
BENGALURU-560032.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI SRINIVAS P
S/O LATE S PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/AT NO 28, THURAGANUR VILLAGE
Digitally signed
by GAJANUR POST, MALAVALLI TALUK
DHANALAKSHMI MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
MURTHY
Location: High
Court of ALSO AT NO 13, 1ST MAIN
Karnataka
9TH CROSS, THIMMAIAH GARDEN
R T NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560032.
2. SMT HANUMAKKA
W/O LATE S PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
3. SRI ARUN RAJ
S/O LATE S PUTTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R2 & R3 ARE RESIDING AT NO 13
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44803
MFA No. 6515 of 2021
I MAIN, THIMMIAH GARDEN
R T NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560032.
4. SMT SUMA DEVI
D/O LATE S PUTTAPPA
W/O SOMASHEKAR
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
5. SMT SUJATHA
D/O LATE S PUTTAPPA
W/O BANU PRAKASH
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
R4 & R5 ARE RESIDING AT NO 222
I MAIN, THIMMIAH GARDEN
R T NAGAR POST, BENGALURU 560032.
6. SMT SHOBHA
D/O LAKSHMAMMA
W/O A M SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
R/AT NO 6/125, 3RD CROSS
H M ROAD, LINGARAJAPURAM
BENGALURU 560084.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SURESH BABU B N.,ADVOCATE FOR R1:
NOTICE TO R2 TO R6 ARE DISPENSED WITH
V/O DATEDF: 15.12.2021)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) R/W
SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:
21.10.2021 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.1087/2019 ON THE
FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU, (CCH NO.13), ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED
U/O.39 RULE 1 AND R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:44803
MFA No. 6515 of 2021
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 11.12.2023 stating that the suit filed before the trial
Court has been disposed of. Hence, the present appeal
does not survive for consideration and the same has
become infructuous.
2. Memo dated 11.12.2023 is taken on record.
3. In view of the above, the present appeal is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!