Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10161 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44858
RFA No. 100 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100 OF 2014 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. M/S. APARNA THEATRES PVT. LTD.,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY
INCORPORATED UNDER THE
INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956
AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
AT NO.20, TANK BUND ROAD
BANGALORE-560 009
Digitally REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
signed by R SHRI. R.B.C. PRAMESHWARA ARADHYA.
MANJUNATHA
Location:
HIGH COURT 2. SHRI. R.B.C. PARAMESHWARA ARADHYA
OF AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
KARNATAKA MANAGING DIRECTOR
M/S. APARNA THEATERS PVT. LTD.
NO.20, TANK BUND ROAD
BANGALORE-560 009.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH KUMAR, ADV.,)
AND:
1. SHRI. M.S. PAPANNA
S/O LATE M. SRINIVASULU
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
R/AT NO.66/1, 17TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN
RMV EXTENSION, BANGALORE-560 080.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44858
RFA No. 100 of 2014
2. SHRI. M.S. MALLAPPA
S/O LATE M. SRINIVASULU
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/AT NO.66/1, 17TH CROSS
8TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION
BANGALORE-560 080.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAAM PRASAD B.S. ADV., FOR R2
R1 SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC.96(1) CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:18.12.2013 PASSED IN
O.S.6980/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX-ADDL. CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE
SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Appellant was earlier represented by
Sri.V.B.Shivakumar, learned counsel. He has filed memo
of retirement. The same was accepted and he has been
permitted to retire from the case by order dated
25.07.2023.
2. Thereafter, this Court issued Court notice by way
of abundant caution to the appellants. The Court notice
NC: 2023:KHC:44858
issued to the 1st appellant returned with an endorsement
'address insufficient for service'. Insofar as the 2nd
appellant is concerned, it has been reported that the 2nd
appellant is no more.
3. In the meantime, Sri.Mahesh Kumar, learned
counsel has filed power stating that he is appearing for the
appellants. Vakalath is accepted by Mahesh Kumar for the
parties namely Pushpalatha, Prashanth, Yogeshwar
Aradhya and Lingamurthy. On perusal of the appeal
memorandum, there are no parties namely Pushpalatha,
Prashanth, Yogeshwar Aradhya and Lingamurthy in the
appeal. The vakalath also styles itself that they are the
legal representatives of the 2nd appellant. No application
is filed seeking an order to bring the legal representatives
of deceased 2nd appellant on record.
4. Under such circumstances, vakalath is defective
and the same is rejected.
NC: 2023:KHC:44858
5. Left with no other alternative, the appeal stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!